nw-por-review-criteria
SolidReview dimensions and bug patterns for journey artifact reviews
Code & Development 526 stars
55 forks Updated 1 weeks ago MIT
Install
Quality Score: 92/100
Stars 20%
Recency 20%
Frontmatter 20%
Documentation 15%
Issue Health 10%
License 10%
Description 5%
Skill Content
# Review Criteria Skill
Domain knowledge for product-owner-reviewer (Eclipse). Covers journey coherence, emotional arcs, shared artifacts, example data quality, CLI UX patterns.
## Review Dimensions
### Journey Coherence
Validate complete flow with no gaps.
Checks: all steps start-to-goal defined | no orphan steps | no dead ends | decision branches lead somewhere | error paths guide to recovery
Severity: critical = missing main flow steps / dead ends | high = orphan steps | medium = ambiguous decisions | low = minor clarity
### Emotional Arc
Validate emotional design quality.
Checks: arc defined (start/middle/end) | all steps annotated | no jarring transitions | confidence builds progressively | error states guide not frustrate
Severity: critical = no arc / major jarring transitions | high = missing key annotations | medium = confidence doesn't build | low = minor polish
### Shared Artifact Tracking
Validate ${variable} sources and consistency.
Checks: all ${variables} have documented source | single source of truth | all consumers listed | integration risks assessed | validation methods specified
Severity: critical = undocumented ${variables} / multiple sources | high = missing consumers / unassessed risks | medium = incomplete validation | low = minor consumer docs
### Example Data Quality
Key review skill -- analyze data for integration gaps.
Checks: realistic not generic | reveals integration dependencies | catches version mismatches | catches path inconsiste...
Details
- Author
- nWave-ai
- Repository
- nWave-ai/nWave
- Created
- 3 months ago
- Last Updated
- 1 weeks ago
- Language
- Python
- License
- MIT
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
Code & Development Solid
nw-par-review-criteria
Quality dimensions and review checklist for devop reviews
526 Updated 1 weeks ago
nWave-ai Code & Development Solid
nw-po-review-dimensions
Requirements quality critique dimensions for peer review - confirmation bias detection, completeness validation, clarity checks, testability assessment, and priority validation
526 Updated 1 weeks ago
nWave-ai Code & Development Solid
nw-der-review-criteria
Evaluation criteria and scoring for data engineering artifact reviews
526 Updated 1 weeks ago
nWave-ai Code & Development Solid
nw-dr-review-criteria
Critique dimensions, severity framework, verdict decision matrix, and review output format for documentation assessment reviews
526 Updated 1 weeks ago
nWave-ai Code & Development Solid
nw-sc-review-dimensions
Reviewer critique dimensions for peer review - implementation bias detection, test quality validation, completeness checks, and priority validation
526 Updated 1 weeks ago
nWave-ai