nw-par-review-criteria

# DevOp Reviewer: Review Criteria ## Critique Dimension 1: Incomplete Phase Handoffs **Pattern**: Phase handoffs missing required artifacts or approvals. **Required per Phase**: - DISCUSS: Requirements document + peer review approval - DESIGN: Architecture document + ADRs + peer review approval - DISTILL: Acceptance tests + peer review approval - DELIVER: Production code + tests (100% passing) + peer review approval **Severity**: critical. Verify all artifacts present and peer-reviewed before phase transition. --- ## Critique Dimension 2: Deployment Readiness Gaps **Pattern**: Feature marked "ready" but missing production prerequisites. **Required**: All tests passing (100%) | Production configuration complete | Monitoring/alerting configured | Runbook/operational docs created | Rollback plan documented. **Severity**: critical. Complete missing prerequisite before marking deployment-ready. --- ## Critique Dimension 3: Traceability Violations **Pattern**: Cannot trace production code back to requirements. **Required**: User stories map to acceptance tests | Acceptance tests map to production code | Code changes traceable to commits | All AC verified in production. **Severity**: high. Establish traceability chain: user-story -> acceptance-tests -> code-commits. --- ## Critique Dimension 4: Priority Validation **Purpose**: Validate roadmap addresses largest bottleneck first, not secondary concern. ### Questions **Q1: Is this the largest bottleneck?** Does timi...