evidence-justification-assessment
SolidEvaluate epistemic warrant, assess evidence quality and relevance, apply epistemic standards appropriate to different domains, and identify sources of knowledge
Install
Quality Score: 96/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- a5c-ai
- Repository
- a5c-ai/babysitter
- Created
- 4 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- JavaScript
- License
- MIT
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
evidence-assessment
Evaluating the quality, provenance, and relevance of evidence that supports or undermines a claim. Covers source credibility, sampling quality, study design, levels of evidence (anecdote to meta-analysis), base rate integration, distinguishing primary from secondary sources, and calibrating belief to evidence strength. Use when the question is not whether an argument is valid but whether its premises are actually supported by the available data.
evidence-verification
This skill teaches agents how to collect and verify evidence before marking tasks complete. Inspired by production-grade development practices, it ensures all claims are backed by executable proof:...
eeat
When the user wants to audit, strengthen, or prepare evidence for Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trust. Also use before registering proof entries in `project/brain/log.md` or referencing them in `project/brain/topic-clusters.md`.
meta-cognitive-reasoning
Meta-cognitive reasoning specialist for evidence-based analysis, hypothesis testing, and cognitive failure prevention. Use when conducting reviews, making assessments, debugging complex issues, or any task requiring rigorous analytical reasoning. Prevents premature conclusions, assumption-based errors, and pattern matching without verification.
evidence-based-development
Enforce evidence-based claims through file:line citations, P1/P2/P3 prioritization proportional to evidence, and the ASSERTION/EVIDENCE/VERIFIED pattern for behavioral claims before any recommendation. Use when gathering evidence, presenting findings, or making development decisions. This skill MUST be consulted because confidence is not evidence, and ungrounded claims cause incorrect development decisions.