evidence-justification-assessment

Solid

Evaluate epistemic warrant, assess evidence quality and relevance, apply epistemic standards appropriate to different domains, and identify sources of knowledge

Code & Development 1,160 stars 71 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 96/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Evidence and Justification Assessment Skill Evaluate epistemic warrant and evidence quality using appropriate standards across different domains of inquiry. ## Overview The Evidence and Justification Assessment skill enables evaluation of epistemic warrant, assessment of evidence quality and relevance, application of epistemic standards appropriate to different domains, identification of knowledge sources, and analysis of justificatory structures. ## Capabilities ### Evidence Evaluation - Assess evidence quality - Evaluate relevance to claims - Consider evidence weight - Identify evidence types - Check evidence reliability ### Justification Analysis - Identify justificatory structures - Evaluate warrant transmission - Assess foundational vs. coherentist structures - Analyze inferential chains - Check for circular reasoning ### Epistemic Standards Application - Apply domain-appropriate standards - Distinguish epistemic contexts - Evaluate certainty requirements - Consider practical stakes - Balance rigor and feasibility ### Source Assessment - Identify knowledge sources - Evaluate source reliability - Consider testimony - Assess expertise claims - Check for bias and conflict ### Skeptical Analysis - Address skeptical challenges - Evaluate defeaters - Consider alternative explanations - Assess epistemic closure - Navigate skeptical arguments ## Usage Guidelines ### When to Use - Evaluating knowledge claims - Assessing arguments - Analyzing evidence - Teaching epist...

Details

Author
a5c-ai
Repository
a5c-ai/babysitter
Created
4 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
JavaScript
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

evidence-assessment

Evaluating the quality, provenance, and relevance of evidence that supports or undermines a claim. Covers source credibility, sampling quality, study design, levels of evidence (anecdote to meta-analysis), base rate integration, distinguishing primary from secondary sources, and calibrating belief to evidence strength. Use when the question is not whether an argument is valid but whether its premises are actually supported by the available data.

62 Updated today
Tibsfox
Code & Development Listed

evidence-verification

This skill teaches agents how to collect and verify evidence before marking tasks complete. Inspired by production-grade development practices, it ensures all claims are backed by executable proof:...

335 Updated today
aiskillstore
AI & Automation Listed

eeat

When the user wants to audit, strengthen, or prepare evidence for Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trust. Also use before registering proof entries in `project/brain/log.md` or referencing them in `project/brain/topic-clusters.md`.

32 Updated 2 days ago
agencia-conversion
Code & Development Solid

meta-cognitive-reasoning

Meta-cognitive reasoning specialist for evidence-based analysis, hypothesis testing, and cognitive failure prevention. Use when conducting reviews, making assessments, debugging complex issues, or any task requiring rigorous analytical reasoning. Prevents premature conclusions, assumption-based errors, and pattern matching without verification.

335 Updated today
aiskillstore
AI & Automation Listed

evidence-based-development

Enforce evidence-based claims through file:line citations, P1/P2/P3 prioritization proportional to evidence, and the ASSERTION/EVIDENCE/VERIFIED pattern for behavioral claims before any recommendation. Use when gathering evidence, presenting findings, or making development decisions. This skill MUST be consulted because confidence is not evidence, and ungrounded claims cause incorrect development decisions.

5 Updated 3 days ago
synaptiai