meta-cognitive-reasoning

Solid

Meta-cognitive reasoning specialist for evidence-based analysis, hypothesis testing, and cognitive failure prevention. Use when conducting reviews, making assessments, debugging complex issues, or any task requiring rigorous analytical reasoning. Prevents premature conclusions, assumption-based errors, and pattern matching without verification.

Code & Development 335 stars 29 forks Updated today

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 85/100

Stars 20%
84
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
0
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Meta-Cognitive Reasoning This skill provides disciplined reasoning frameworks for avoiding cognitive failures in analysis, reviews, and decision-making. It enforces evidence-based conclusions, multiple hypothesis generation, and systematic verification. ## When to Use This Skill - Before making claims about code, systems, or versions - When conducting code reviews or architectural assessments - When debugging issues with multiple possible causes - When encountering unfamiliar patterns or versions - When making recommendations that could have significant impact - When pattern matching triggers immediate conclusions - When analyzing documentation or specifications - During any task requiring rigorous analytical reasoning ## What This Skill Does 1. **Evidence-Based Reasoning**: Enforces showing evidence before interpretation 2. **Multiple Hypothesis Generation**: Prevents premature commitment to single explanation 3. **Temporal Knowledge Verification**: Handles knowledge cutoff limitations 4. **Cognitive Failure Prevention**: Recognizes and prevents common reasoning errors 5. **Self-Correction Protocol**: Provides framework for transparent error correction 6. **Scope Discipline**: Allocates cognitive effort appropriately ## Core Principles ### 1. Evidence-Based Reasoning Protocol **Universal Rule: Never conclude without proof** ``` MANDATORY SEQUENCE: 1. Show tool output FIRST 2. Quote specific evidence 3. THEN interpret ``` **Forbidden Phrases:** - "I assume" - "ty...

Details

Author
aiskillstore
Repository
aiskillstore/marketplace
Created
5 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Python
License
None

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

DevOps & Infrastructure Listed

scientific-thinking

Use when interpreting research findings, evaluating scientific evidence, analyzing mechanisms, comparing competing hypotheses, designing experiments, or constructing scientific arguments.

0 Updated today
felipedeso7za4444
Code & Development Solid

rigorous-reasoning

Prevent sycophantic reasoning via checklist enforcing evidence-based conclusions and honest analysis.

297 Updated today
athola
AI & Automation Listed

mkelicit

Structured second-pass reasoning after code review or plan evaluation. Offers named reasoning methods (pre-mortem, inversion, red team, Socratic, etc.) to re-examine findings through a specific lens. Use after /mk:review verdict or any time deeper analysis is needed on an existing output. NOT for initial review (see mk:review); NOT for creating implementation plans (see mk:plan-creator).

14 Updated today
ngocsangyem
AI & Automation Listed

fact-check

Enforces evidence-based reasoning for any task that involves making factual claims about a codebase — debugging, bug fixing, code investigation, code modification, AND explaining what code does, answering "where is X" / "what does Y do" / "is this safe", or summarizing behavior. Use this skill whenever the user asks to fix a bug, investigate an issue, modify existing code, trace a problem, debug behavior, refactor, change, update code, or explain/locate/audit any part of the codebase. This skill ensures Claude gathers real evidence from source code, docs, git history, and runtime behavior before making any claim — never guessing, never paraphrasing comments as fact, never relying on training memory. Even if the task seems straightforward, use this skill to guarantee that every claim and recommendation is grounded in verified facts.

0 Updated 2 days ago
Stoica-Mihai
AI & Automation Listed

critical-thinking

Challenge what you think is right — alternative hypotheses, missing data, evidence quality, bias detection, falsifiability, and adversarial review

0 Updated yesterday
fabioc-aloha