meta-cognitive-reasoning
SolidMeta-cognitive reasoning specialist for evidence-based analysis, hypothesis testing, and cognitive failure prevention. Use when conducting reviews, making assessments, debugging complex issues, or any task requiring rigorous analytical reasoning. Prevents premature conclusions, assumption-based errors, and pattern matching without verification.
Install
Quality Score: 85/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- aiskillstore
- Repository
- aiskillstore/marketplace
- Created
- 5 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- Python
- License
- None
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
scientific-thinking
Use when interpreting research findings, evaluating scientific evidence, analyzing mechanisms, comparing competing hypotheses, designing experiments, or constructing scientific arguments.
rigorous-reasoning
Prevent sycophantic reasoning via checklist enforcing evidence-based conclusions and honest analysis.
mkelicit
Structured second-pass reasoning after code review or plan evaluation. Offers named reasoning methods (pre-mortem, inversion, red team, Socratic, etc.) to re-examine findings through a specific lens. Use after /mk:review verdict or any time deeper analysis is needed on an existing output. NOT for initial review (see mk:review); NOT for creating implementation plans (see mk:plan-creator).
fact-check
Enforces evidence-based reasoning for any task that involves making factual claims about a codebase — debugging, bug fixing, code investigation, code modification, AND explaining what code does, answering "where is X" / "what does Y do" / "is this safe", or summarizing behavior. Use this skill whenever the user asks to fix a bug, investigate an issue, modify existing code, trace a problem, debug behavior, refactor, change, update code, or explain/locate/audit any part of the codebase. This skill ensures Claude gathers real evidence from source code, docs, git history, and runtime behavior before making any claim — never guessing, never paraphrasing comments as fact, never relying on training memory. Even if the task seems straightforward, use this skill to guarantee that every claim and recommendation is grounded in verified facts.
critical-thinking
Challenge what you think is right — alternative hypotheses, missing data, evidence quality, bias detection, falsifiability, and adversarial review