evidence-assessment
SolidEvaluating the quality, provenance, and relevance of evidence that supports or undermines a claim. Covers source credibility, sampling quality, study design, levels of evidence (anecdote to meta-analysis), base rate integration, distinguishing primary from secondary sources, and calibrating belief to evidence strength. Use when the question is not whether an argument is valid but whether its premises are actually supported by the available data.
Install
Quality Score: 79/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- Tibsfox
- Repository
- Tibsfox/gsd-skill-creator
- Created
- 5 months ago
- Last Updated
- 1 weeks ago
- Language
- TypeScript
- License
- NOASSERTION
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
evidence-tiering
Shared credibility framework for weighing any AI-related claim — a benchmark result, a model/tool announcement, a research paper, a demo, or a viral thread — by the quality of its source rather than how confidently it's stated. Use this any time you're about to repeat a claim about AI capabilities, performance, or news without having checked where it actually came from. Other skills (ai-release-triage, ai-pulse) call into this for their source-vetting step, but use it standalone too whenever a claim about AI needs a credibility check before you pass it on.
argument-evaluation
Systematic evaluation of arguments for structure, validity, soundness, and charitable interpretation. Covers premise identification, conclusion extraction, argument mapping, steel-manning, and the distinction between validity (form) and soundness (form plus true premises). Use when assessing an argument, reconstructing an opponent's position fairly, or preparing a rebuttal.
evidence-synthesis
Turn a pile of sources into a defensible claim. Use for "what does the literature actually say?", conflicting studies or benchmarks, "is this result trustworthy?", arguments that need claim-evidence-warrant structure, qualitative data needing coding, or a theory with no catalog of its own contradicting evidence.