paper-review
SolidReview academic papers for correctness, quality, and novelty using OpenJudge's multi-stage pipeline. Supports PDF files and LaTeX source packages (.tar.gz/.zip). Covers 10 disciplines: cs, medicine, physics, chemistry, biology, economics, psychology, environmental_science, mathematics, social_sciences. Use when the user asks to review, evaluate, critique, or assess a research paper, check references, or verify a BibTeX file.
Install
Quality Score: 92/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- agentscope-ai
- Repository
- agentscope-ai/OpenJudge
- Created
- 10 months ago
- Last Updated
- 3 days ago
- Language
- Python
- License
- Apache-2.0
Integrates with
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
academic-paper-reviewer
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.
academic-paper-reviewer
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.
paper-review
Use this skill when the user wants to simulate a review of their paper, check it before submission, or understand how reviewers might perceive it. Triggers include: "review my paper", "simulate review", "check before submit", "reviewer perspective", "will this get accepted". Also use before submission to catch weaknesses that reviewers would find.
paper-self-review
This skill should be used when the user asks to "review paper quality", "check paper completeness", "validate paper structure", "self-review before submission", or mentions systematic paper quality checking. Provides comprehensive quality assurance checklist for academic papers.
paper-reviewer
Conduct a formal peer review of a scientific paper Heath did NOT author — for a journal he is reviewing for, or as a pre-submission read for a collaborator. Six-phase workflow with a Coordinator (segments paper + routes), 6 parallel specialist subagents (Methods Auditor, Logic Checker, Presentation, Journal Fit, Adversarial Reader, Citation Verifier), a Synthesizer, and a Refiner that applies the structural rubric (blocking vs advisory tags, 3:1 minor:major cap, action-oriented minor comments). Output is a markdown review tuned to Heath's voice via the bundled voice.md. Bundle reference content lives at `Shared drives/Blackmon Lab/ Projects/paper-reviewer/` (agents/, references/, checklists/, voice.md). TRIGGER on: "review this paper", "peer review", "referee for <journal>", "what do I think of this manuscript", a directory of review materials, mention of revision/rebuttal/response-to-reviewers. Distinct from `pre_submission_review` (which is for Heath's OWN drafts heading to submission, not papers he is revi