academic-paper-reviewer

Solid

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.

Code & Development 25,522 stars 2100 forks Updated today NOASSERTION

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 86/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Academic Paper Reviewer v1.9.1 — Multi-Perspective Academic Paper Review Agent Team Simulates a complete international journal peer review process: automatically identifies the paper's field, dynamically configures 5 reviewers (Editor-in-Chief + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) who review from four non-overlapping perspectives — methodology, domain expertise, cross-disciplinary viewpoints, and core argument challenges — ultimately producing a structured Editorial Decision and Revision Roadmap. **v1.1 Improvements**: 1. Added Devil's Advocate Reviewer — specifically challenges core arguments, detects logical fallacies, and identifies the strongest counter-arguments 2. Added `re-review` mode — verification review, focused on checking whether revisions address the review comments 3. Expanded review team from 4 to 5 members > **Routing discipline (v3.9.2):** see `.claude/CLAUDE.md` "Routing Discipline (v3.9.2)" + `shared/references/intent_clarification_protocol.md` for cross-skill routing rules. This skill assumes routing has already settled — ambiguous cross-phase materials should have been clarified upstream. --- ## Quick Start **Simplest command:** ``` Review this paper: [paste paper or provide file] ``` **Output:** 1. Automatically identifies the paper's field and methodology type 2. Dynamically configures the specific identities and expertise of 5 reviewers 3. 5 independent review reports (each from a different perspective) 4. 1 Editorial Decision Letter + Revis...

Details

Author
Imbad0202
Repository
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Created
3 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Python
License
NOASSERTION

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

academic-paper-reviewer

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.

0 Updated 2 days ago
fabioc-aloha
AI & Automation Listed

paper-review

Use this skill when the user wants to simulate a review of their paper, check it before submission, or understand how reviewers might perceive it. Triggers include: "review my paper", "simulate review", "check before submit", "reviewer perspective", "will this get accepted". Also use before submission to catch weaknesses that reviewers would find.

2 Updated 4 days ago
charlotte-12s
AI & Automation Listed

paper-reviewer

Conduct a formal peer review of a scientific paper Heath did NOT author — for a journal he is reviewing for, or as a pre-submission read for a collaborator. Six-phase workflow with a Coordinator (segments paper + routes), 6 parallel specialist subagents (Methods Auditor, Logic Checker, Presentation, Journal Fit, Adversarial Reader, Citation Verifier), a Synthesizer, and a Refiner that applies the structural rubric (blocking vs advisory tags, 3:1 minor:major cap, action-oriented minor comments). Output is a markdown review tuned to Heath's voice via the bundled voice.md. Bundle reference content lives at `Shared drives/Blackmon Lab/ Projects/paper-reviewer/` (agents/, references/, checklists/, voice.md). TRIGGER on: "review this paper", "peer review", "referee for <journal>", "what do I think of this manuscript", a directory of review materials, mention of revision/rebuttal/response-to-reviewers. Distinct from `pre_submission_review` (which is for Heath's OWN drafts heading to submission, not papers he is revi

0 Updated yesterday
coleoguy
Data & Documents Solid

paper-review

Review academic papers for correctness, quality, and novelty using OpenJudge's multi-stage pipeline. Supports PDF files and LaTeX source packages (.tar.gz/.zip). Covers 10 disciplines: cs, medicine, physics, chemistry, biology, economics, psychology, environmental_science, mathematics, social_sciences. Use when the user asks to review, evaluate, critique, or assess a research paper, check references, or verify a BibTeX file.

633 Updated 3 days ago
agentscope-ai
Data & Documents Solid

academic-paper

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 10 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見.

25,522 Updated today
Imbad0202