academic-paper-reviewer
SolidMulti-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.
Install
Quality Score: 86/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- Imbad0202
- Repository
- Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
- Created
- 7 months ago
- Last Updated
- yesterday
- Language
- Python
- License
- NOASSERTION
Bundled in these plugins
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
academic-paper-reviewer
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.
academic-paper-reviewer
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.
paper-review
Human-driven peer review of a scientific manuscript with Claude as the second reader. Claude reads the whole paper at once, tests the reviewer's impression against the text, builds a line-anchored ledger of claims and gaps, calibrates the score against the rubric's boundaries, and constrains and error-checks the summary, title and review the reviewer writes. For conference, workshop and journal reviews once the PDF and the review form are in hand.