paper-self-review

Solid

This skill should be used when the user asks to "review paper quality", "check paper completeness", "validate paper structure", "self-review before submission", or mentions systematic paper quality checking. Provides comprehensive quality assurance checklist for academic papers.

Code & Development 4,135 stars 374 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 96/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Paper Self-Review A systematic paper quality checking tool that helps researchers conduct comprehensive self-review before submission. ## Core Features ### 1. Structure Review Check whether all sections of the paper are complete and conform to academic standards: - Does the Abstract include problem, method, results, and contributions? - Does the Introduction clearly articulate research motivation and background? - Is the Method detailed enough to be reproducible? - Do the Results sufficiently support the conclusions? - Does the Discussion address limitations and future work? ### 2. Logic Consistency Check Verify the logical coherence of the paper: - Do research questions match the methodology? - Does the experimental design support the research hypotheses? - Are result interpretations reasonable? - Are conclusions supported by evidence? ### 3. Citation Completeness Check the completeness and accuracy of citations: - Are all citations present in the references? - Is the reference format consistent? - Are key related works cited? - Do citations accurately reflect the original content? ### 4. Figure/Table Quality Evaluate the quality and effectiveness of figures and tables: - Do all figures/tables have clear titles and captions? - Do figures/tables support the text narrative? - Are figures/tables clear and readable? - Do formats comply with journal/conference requirements? ### 5. Writing Clarity Check writing clarity and readability: - Is the language concise and c...

Details

Author
Galaxy-Dawn
Repository
Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar
Created
4 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Python
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

paper-review

Use this skill when the user wants to simulate a review of their paper, check it before submission, or understand how reviewers might perceive it. Triggers include: "review my paper", "simulate review", "check before submit", "reviewer perspective", "will this get accepted". Also use before submission to catch weaknesses that reviewers would find.

2 Updated 4 days ago
charlotte-12s
AI & Automation Listed

paper-audit

Use this skill when the user wants to audit their paper pipeline, run a pre-submission check, or verify quality before submitting. Triggers include: "audit pipeline", "check everything", "pre-submission check", "quality check", "verify pipeline", "final check". Also use as the mandatory final step before any submission (Rule 16).

2 Updated 4 days ago
charlotte-12s
Code & Development Listed

academic-paper-writing

Use when running pre-submission readiness checks, reviewer self-audit, anonymization scans, reference hygiene, or page/format verification on academic LaTeX papers. Invoke when the user asks to "review for submission", "do a reviewer self-check", "anonymize", "check page count", "verify references", or before any conference/journal submission. Do NOT invoke during early drafting; this skill targets the cleanup/sprint phase before submission.

0 Updated 1 weeks ago
IanLiYi1996
Code & Development Listed

self-review

Pre-submission self-review for the user's own manuscripts, applying a reviewer perspective. Systematic check across 10 categories with research-type branching. Outputs Anticipated Major/Minor Comments with severity framing and optional R0 numbering for /revise pipeline integration.

126 Updated today
Aperivue
Code & Development Listed

paper-revision-editor

Revise, copy-edit, polish, or respond to reviewer comments on an academic paper section. Diagnoses logical flow, argumentation, copyediting, and reader experience while preserving voice, citations, and numerical claims.

0 Updated yesterday
ipeirotis