design-information-prep

Featured

Extract evidence-grounded project facts from user-provided design attachments, identify missing information, and prepare the exact written fields required by supported design-award entry forms. Use when a user asks to prepare, draft, adapt, translate, or validate application text for iF, iF Student, Red Dot Product Design, IDEA, DIA, K-Design, GOOD DESIGN AWARD Japan, Core77, James Dyson, or EPDA. Also use to build a reusable project dossier from briefs, decks, reports, manuals, patents, research, images, or prior application materials. Do not use for award selection alone, winner retrieval, design-quality scoring, final file-format auditing, or winning-probability prediction.

Code & Development 448 stars 12 forks Updated today Apache-2.0

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 91/100

Stars 20%
88
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Design Information Prep ## Purpose Turn user-authorized attachments into a reusable, evidence-linked project dossier, then compile that dossier into the exact text fields required by one supported award route. Generate no project fact from past-winner copy or unsupported inference. ## Runtime Boundary - Treat user attachments and explicit user confirmations as the only sources of project facts. - Read local award field specifications for field names, limits, routing, and drafting instructions. - Do not connect to Supabase, read `.env`, query winner databases, or place full winner descriptions in model context. - Use optional aggregate benchmark profiles only for coverage prompts such as what evidence to look for. Never use them as project facts, prose templates, hidden judging preferences, or winning probabilities. - Verify current official rules at request time. Stored specifications record a checked date, not permanent truth. ## Input Contract Accept PDFs, presentations, documents, spreadsheets, images, videos, structured JSON, or plain text. Determine or request: - exact award, cycle, route, and language; - applicant type and project maturity when they affect routing; - all user-authorized project materials; - confidentiality or publication restrictions; - whether the user wants a dossier, missing-information audit, draft fields, translation, or final text validation. If the award or route is unknown, use `$design-award-match` first. If the user only wants final ...

Details

Author
SeanJ1ang
Repository
SeanJ1ang/design-judge-skills
Created
1 weeks ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Python
License
Apache-2.0

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Web & Frontend Featured

design-award-match

Match a design project to supported design-award programs, tracks, and entry categories; apply structural eligibility gates; verify current official rules; compare published criteria and cautiously described winner trends; and output fit, evidence confidence, and submission priority. Use when a user asks which award or category to enter, compares awards, or requests an award-fit analysis. Supports iF, iF Student, Red Dot Product, Red Dot Design Concept, IDEA, DIA, K-Design, GOOD DESIGN AWARD Japan, Core77, James Dyson, and EPDA. Do not use for winner retrieval alone, detailed submission-file compliance, general design evaluation, optimization, or winning-probability prediction.

448 Updated today
SeanJ1ang
Web & Frontend Featured

design-award-search

Find and verify award-winning designs in the same or adjacent functional category through eight explicit relevance dimensions: problem and user, core function, sensing technology, intervention mechanism, physical form, use context and workflow, system architecture, and visual language. Use when a user asks for same-category winners, comparable precedents, design benchmarks, appearance-related award winners, or examples from iF Design, Red Dot, IDEA, or iF Design Student Award. Do not use this skill to score, judge, optimize, or match the user's design to an award.

448 Updated today
SeanJ1ang
Web & Frontend Featured

design-evaluation

Evaluate one design or a user-approved maturity-mapped batch through a transparent evidence-based rubric. Classify each work, score design quality and presentation, identify Critical risks, report evidence confidence, and optionally shortlist works within separate maturity tracks. Use when a user asks to judge, score, critique, review, diagnose, batch-evaluate, or rank designs by evidence-aligned evaluation score. Do not use this skill to retrieve winners, choose an award, produce a redesign, audit submission-file compliance, simulate an official jury, or predict winning probability.

448 Updated today
SeanJ1ang