design-award-search

Featured

Find and verify award-winning designs in the same or adjacent functional category through eight explicit relevance dimensions: problem and user, core function, sensing technology, intervention mechanism, physical form, use context and workflow, system architecture, and visual language. Use when a user asks for same-category winners, comparable precedents, design benchmarks, appearance-related award winners, or examples from iF Design, Red Dot, IDEA, or iF Design Student Award. Do not use this skill to score, judge, optimize, or match the user's design to an award.

Web & Frontend 448 stars 12 forks Updated today Apache-2.0

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 91/100

Stars 20%
88
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Design Award Search ## Purpose Retrieve a small, high-precision set of verified award-winning designs. Keep the functional design category as a mandatory boundary, then search separately across eight relevance dimensions. Search public official sources at request time. Do not connect to, package, or depend on a private award database. ## Scope Boundary - Identify the user's canonical design category. - Search selected relevance dimensions independently. - Verify award identity, year, category, relation evidence, and official URL. - Explain exactly which dimension makes each result relevant. - Stop after retrieval. Do not score the design, predict winning probability, recommend changes, or select an award to enter. ## User Interaction Contract Accept a project description, image set, PDF, project page, or brief. Accept optional dimensions, award sources, years, and result count. Require enough information to identify the object or service and its primary function. If the primary function remains ambiguous, ask exactly one short question: `What is the design's primary function and who uses it?` Otherwise state reasonable assumptions and continue. When the user does not select dimensions, use balanced mode across every dimension supported by the supplied evidence. Use user images to infer physical-form and visual-language terms. If no image is supplied, do not activate visual-language relevance unless the user supplies explicit visual descriptors. Offer this template ...

Details

Author
SeanJ1ang
Repository
SeanJ1ang/design-judge-skills
Created
1 weeks ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Python
License
Apache-2.0

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Web & Frontend Featured

design-award-match

Match a design project to supported design-award programs, tracks, and entry categories; apply structural eligibility gates; verify current official rules; compare published criteria and cautiously described winner trends; and output fit, evidence confidence, and submission priority. Use when a user asks which award or category to enter, compares awards, or requests an award-fit analysis. Supports iF, iF Student, Red Dot Product, Red Dot Design Concept, IDEA, DIA, K-Design, GOOD DESIGN AWARD Japan, Core77, James Dyson, and EPDA. Do not use for winner retrieval alone, detailed submission-file compliance, general design evaluation, optimization, or winning-probability prediction.

448 Updated today
SeanJ1ang
Web & Frontend Featured

design-evaluation

Evaluate one design or a user-approved maturity-mapped batch through a transparent evidence-based rubric. Classify each work, score design quality and presentation, identify Critical risks, report evidence confidence, and optionally shortlist works within separate maturity tracks. Use when a user asks to judge, score, critique, review, diagnose, batch-evaluate, or rank designs by evidence-aligned evaluation score. Do not use this skill to retrieve winners, choose an award, produce a redesign, audit submission-file compliance, simulate an official jury, or predict winning probability.

448 Updated today
SeanJ1ang
Web & Frontend Featured

design-submission-check

Audit a design-award submission package against the current official rules for a specific award cycle. Check required materials and technical constraints, cross-material facts and claims, rights and disclosure risks, and final submission readiness. Use when a user asks for a pre-submission check, compliance review, missing-material audit, consistency check, or final go/no-go decision. Do not use this skill to choose an award, retrieve winners, judge the design itself, rewrite the whole entry, or give a legal clearance opinion.

448 Updated today
SeanJ1ang