ux-review

Solid

Validates a UX spec, HUD design, or interaction pattern library for completeness, accessibility compliance, GDD alignment, and implementation readiness. Produces APPROVED / NEEDS REVISION / MAJOR REVISION NEEDED verdict with specific gaps.

Web & Frontend 20,555 stars 2999 forks Updated 1 weeks ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 97/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
90
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

## Overview Validates UX design documents before they enter the implementation pipeline. Acts as the quality gate between UX Design and Visual Design/Implementation in the `/team-ui` pipeline. **Run this skill:** - After completing a UX spec with `/ux-design` - Before handing off to `ui-programmer` or `art-director` - Before the Pre-Production to Production gate check (which requires key screens to have reviewed UX specs) - After major revisions to a UX spec **Verdict levels:** - **APPROVED** — spec is complete, consistent, and implementation-ready - **NEEDS REVISION** — specific gaps found; fix before handoff but not a full redesign - **MAJOR REVISION NEEDED** — fundamental issues with scope, player need, or completeness; needs significant rework --- ## Phase 1: Parse Arguments - **Specific file path** (e.g., `/ux-review design/ux/inventory.md`): validate that one document - **`all`**: find all files in `design/ux/` and validate each - **`hud`**: validate `design/ux/hud.md` specifically - **`patterns`**: validate `design/ux/interaction-patterns.md` specifically - **No argument**: ask the user which spec to validate For `all`, output a summary table first (file | verdict | primary issue) then full detail for each. --- ## Phase 2: Load Cross-Reference Context Before validating any spec, load: 1. **Input & Platform config**: Read `.claude/docs/technical-preferences.md` and extract `## Input & Platform`. This is the authoritative source for which input met...

Details

Author
Donchitos
Repository
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios
Created
3 months ago
Last Updated
1 weeks ago
Language
Shell
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Web & Frontend Solid

ux-design

Guided, section-by-section UX spec authoring for a screen, flow, or HUD. Reads game concept, player journey, and relevant GDDs to provide context-aware design guidance. Produces ux-spec.md (per screen/flow) or hud-design.md using the studio templates.

20,555 Updated 1 weeks ago
Donchitos
Web & Frontend Listed

ux

Reviews UX, accessibility, and microcopy for web and React Native (Expo) applications. Analyzes UI code against established UX principles, WCAG 2.2 accessibility standards, platform guidelines (Apple HIG, Material Design 3), and UX writing best practices. Triggers on: "ux review", "review ux", "check accessibility", "improve the UI", "ux audit", "review this component", "is this accessible", "check usability", "ux feedback", "review the design", "improve usability", "check contrast", "review navigation", "ux writing", "improve copy", "review microcopy", "make this more intuitive", "ux best practices", "/ux".

4 Updated 2 days ago
mthines
Web & Frontend Listed

web-ui-ux

Web UI/UX specialist guidance for designing, reviewing, and polishing web product UI (layout, usability, microcopy, accessibility, responsive behavior, forms, navigation). Use when asked to improve UI/UX, audit a page, design a screen, create a component spec, or generate HTML head/manifest/icon guidance for a web app; optionally applicable to Unreal UI (UMG) for UX heuristics.

1 Updated today
KhaiEr720
Web & Frontend Listed

aio-uiux

Web UI design and review advisor — applies UX psychology, interaction patterns, WCAG accessibility, and modern CSS to design new interfaces or critique existing ones. Use proactively when reviewing any frontend UI, scaffolding new components, or deciding layout/color/typography trade-offs.

3 Updated 2 days ago
aiocean
Web & Frontend Listed

ux-evaluator

This skill should be used when evaluating UI components against UX best practices. Use for reviewing buttons, navigation elements, spacing, visual hierarchy, or any interface element. Provides a systematic 3-dimension framework (Position, Visual Weight, Spacing) aligned with industry standards (Balsamiq, Nielsen heuristics). Invoke when user asks to "review UX", "check button design", "evaluate layout", or references design guidelines.

335 Updated today
aiskillstore