ux

Solid

Reviews UX, accessibility, and microcopy for web and React Native (Expo) applications. Analyzes UI code against established UX principles, WCAG 2.2 accessibility standards, platform guidelines (Apple HIG, Material Design 3), and UX writing best practices. Triggers on: "ux review", "review ux", "check accessibility", "improve the UI", "ux audit", "review this component", "is this accessible", "check usability", "ux feedback", "review the design", "improve usability", "check contrast", "review navigation", "ux writing", "improve copy", "review microcopy", "make this more intuitive", "ux best practices", "/ux".

Web & Frontend 13 stars 2 forks Updated yesterday MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 86/100

Stars 20%
38
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# UX Review Skill You are an expert UX reviewer specializing in web and React Native (Expo) applications. Your role is to analyze UI code and provide actionable, specific feedback grounded in established UX principles, accessibility standards, and platform guidelines. ## Invocation When triggered, follow this workflow: ### Phase 1: Context Discovery 1. **Identify target**: Determine which files/components to review from: - User's explicit request ("review this component") - Recent git changes (`git diff --name-only HEAD~1` for changed UI files) - Current file context if invoked inline 2. **Detect platform**: Determine if reviewing: - **Web**: JSX with HTML elements, CSS/Tailwind/styled-components - **React Native / Expo**: `View`, `Text`, `TouchableOpacity`, `expo-router`, etc. - **Both**: Shared components or cross-platform code - If ambiguous, ask the user. 3. **Read the code**: Read all target files completely. Do not review code you haven't read. ### Phase 2: Analysis Load relevant rule files from `rules/` based on what the code contains: | Code Contains | Load Rule File | |---|---| | Any UI code | `rules/core-principles.md` (always) | | Color values, themes, contrast | `rules/visual-design.md` | | Navigation, routing, tabs, drawers | `rules/navigation-and-layout.md` | | Form elements, inputs, validation | `rules/forms-and-input.md` | | Touchable/clickable elements, buttons | `rules/touch-and-interaction.md` | | Loading states, async, data fet...

Details

Author
mthines
Repository
mthines/agent-skills
Created
4 months ago
Last Updated
yesterday
Language
JavaScript
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Web & Frontend Listed

ux-design-review

Use when the user wants a UX or design review of implemented UI — components, pages, or flows — against its design source, covering accessibility (WCAG 2.2 AA), interaction states, responsiveness, design fidelity, and design-system conformity. Triggers on "review the checkout page", "check this UI before I ship it", "is this accessible", "does this match the design". Live-environment-first: drives the rendered UI in a real browser where possible. Works with any framework or design tooling. Produces a structured verdict with a coverage statement; writes no source changes. Do NOT use to address or fix UX findings (ux-design-fix), for code correctness or security review (code-review), to review a tdd.md document (docs-review), or to implement features (implement).

2 Updated 3 weeks ago
carinyaparc
AI & Automation Listed

review-ux

UX quality review - usability, accessibility, user flows, and how the UI feels. Use for evaluating user experience from code, markup, specs, and screenshots.

7 Updated yesterday
mayankmankhand
Web & Frontend Listed

aie-web-ux

Review a website or web app for usability and user-experience problems that hurt real visitors — confusing navigation, weak visual hierarchy, buttons that don't look clickable, forms with poor feedback, cluttered layouts, mobile/touch issues, low readability, and missing error handling. Evaluates against Nielsen's usability heuristics and WCAG-informed readability, then scores each area and lists prioritized, actionable fixes. Trigger on "review the UX," "UX review," "usability review," "is my site easy to use," "hard to navigate," "confusing layout," "improve the flow," "design review," "mobile experience," "users can't find," or "information architecture."

2 Updated yesterday
mrhinkle