ux
SolidReviews UX, accessibility, and microcopy for web and React Native (Expo) applications. Analyzes UI code against established UX principles, WCAG 2.2 accessibility standards, platform guidelines (Apple HIG, Material Design 3), and UX writing best practices. Triggers on: "ux review", "review ux", "check accessibility", "improve the UI", "ux audit", "review this component", "is this accessible", "check usability", "ux feedback", "review the design", "improve usability", "check contrast", "review navigation", "ux writing", "improve copy", "review microcopy", "make this more intuitive", "ux best practices", "/ux".
Install
Quality Score: 86/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- mthines
- Repository
- mthines/agent-skills
- Created
- 4 months ago
- Last Updated
- yesterday
- Language
- JavaScript
- License
- MIT
Integrates with
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
ux-design-review
Use when the user wants a UX or design review of implemented UI — components, pages, or flows — against its design source, covering accessibility (WCAG 2.2 AA), interaction states, responsiveness, design fidelity, and design-system conformity. Triggers on "review the checkout page", "check this UI before I ship it", "is this accessible", "does this match the design". Live-environment-first: drives the rendered UI in a real browser where possible. Works with any framework or design tooling. Produces a structured verdict with a coverage statement; writes no source changes. Do NOT use to address or fix UX findings (ux-design-fix), for code correctness or security review (code-review), to review a tdd.md document (docs-review), or to implement features (implement).
review-ux
UX quality review - usability, accessibility, user flows, and how the UI feels. Use for evaluating user experience from code, markup, specs, and screenshots.
aie-web-ux
Review a website or web app for usability and user-experience problems that hurt real visitors — confusing navigation, weak visual hierarchy, buttons that don't look clickable, forms with poor feedback, cluttered layouts, mobile/touch issues, low readability, and missing error handling. Evaluates against Nielsen's usability heuristics and WCAG-informed readability, then scores each area and lists prioritized, actionable fixes. Trigger on "review the UX," "UX review," "usability review," "is my site easy to use," "hard to navigate," "confusing layout," "improve the flow," "design review," "mobile experience," "users can't find," or "information architecture."