roughdraft-review

Solid

Open a Markdown file in Roughdraft, wait for the user's CriticMarkup review, then apply or respond to the feedback.

AI & Automation 81 stars 10 forks Updated today CC-BY-4.0

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 86/100

Stars 20%
64
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Roughdraft review Roughdraft is a single-file Markdown viewer/editor for inline review. The user may refer to it as `rd` in natural language; treat `rd` as shorthand, but do not create or modify any shell alias, executable, symlink, or command named `rd`. When the user asks for a plan, write the plan as a Markdown file on disk before asking them to review it. ## Opening a file for review ```bash roughdraft open "/absolute/path/to/file.md" ``` Open one `.md` file at a time. If Roughdraft is not running, `roughdraft open` starts it automatically. **Leave the command running.** Do not interrupt, kill, background, detach, or treat the waiting process as cleanup. The wait is intentional: Roughdraft exits the command after the user clicks Done Reviewing, and that exit is the signal to resume — read the file from disk and respond to any CriticMarkup comments or suggested changes. ## CriticMarkup (Roughdraft-flavored) Base markers: - Comment: `{>>comment<<}` - Insertion: `{++new text++}` - Deletion: `{--old text--}` - Substitution: `{~~old~>new~~}` - Highlight: `{==text==}` Each marker may be followed by an attribute block: `id` (stable document-local id), `by` (author), `at` (ISO timestamp), `re` (parent comment/suggestion id in a reply thread). When adding a new comment or suggested change: generate a stable id (`c1`, `c2`, … for comments; `s1`, `s2`, … for suggestions), set `by` to your agent label, set `at` to the current ISO timestamp, and set `re` when replying. P...

Details

Author
zby
Repository
zby/commonplace
Created
4 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Python
License
CC-BY-4.0

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Code & Development Solid

comment-review

Review markdown or HTML artifacts before fixation (publish/commit/deposit/merge) via /inquire × /sublate × /gap × /contextualize through a channel-first browser preview loop. Markdown renders via marked; HTML serves directly through a Shadow DOM. Each round mode is `apply + scan` (apply queued comments now + scan to surface findings into the next round's sidepanel) or `apply` (apply only). User-invoked via /comment-review.

125 Updated today
jongwony
AI & Automation Solid

doc-review

Use when the user asks to review or critique a prose planning document — a plan, spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design doc.

33 Updated today
OutlineDriven
Code & Development Solid

editorial-review

Document-level STRUCTURAL editor for long deliverables. Reviews a draft's argument architecture -- section ordering, claim-to-evidence linkage, hierarchy, redundancy, buried lede, missing sections -- and proposes CUT / MERGE / MOVE / CONDENSE / SPLIT / ADD / PROMOTE / PRESERVE operations with word-savings estimates, BEFORE any sentence is touched. Content is sacrosanct: it reorganizes, it never argues with the ideas. Phase 2 hands all sentence-level work (rhythm, specificity, vocabulary) to the always-on humanization.md prose rule -- it never duplicates that. Use when the user says "editorial pass", "structural review", "review the structure of this", "tighten this document", "restructure this draft", or wants a long proposal / brief / report's argument arc checked. Do NOT use for: sentence-level prose / "make this sound human" (that is humanization.md), typo or grammar fixes (sanitize-text + humanization-check), fact-checking (/validate), artifact grading (/evaluate), short chat replies, or atomic /zk notes.

10 Updated today
mishahanin