roughdraft-review
SolidOpen a Markdown file in Roughdraft, wait for the user's CriticMarkup review, then apply or respond to the feedback.
Install
Quality Score: 86/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- zby
- Repository
- zby/commonplace
- Created
- 4 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- Python
- License
- CC-BY-4.0
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
comment-review
Review markdown or HTML artifacts before fixation (publish/commit/deposit/merge) via /inquire × /sublate × /gap × /contextualize through a channel-first browser preview loop. Markdown renders via marked; HTML serves directly through a Shadow DOM. Each round mode is `apply + scan` (apply queued comments now + scan to surface findings into the next round's sidepanel) or `apply` (apply only). User-invoked via /comment-review.
doc-review
Use when the user asks to review or critique a prose planning document — a plan, spec, PRD, requirements doc, or design doc.
editorial-review
Document-level STRUCTURAL editor for long deliverables. Reviews a draft's argument architecture -- section ordering, claim-to-evidence linkage, hierarchy, redundancy, buried lede, missing sections -- and proposes CUT / MERGE / MOVE / CONDENSE / SPLIT / ADD / PROMOTE / PRESERVE operations with word-savings estimates, BEFORE any sentence is touched. Content is sacrosanct: it reorganizes, it never argues with the ideas. Phase 2 hands all sentence-level work (rhythm, specificity, vocabulary) to the always-on humanization.md prose rule -- it never duplicates that. Use when the user says "editorial pass", "structural review", "review the structure of this", "tighten this document", "restructure this draft", or wants a long proposal / brief / report's argument arc checked. Do NOT use for: sentence-level prose / "make this sound human" (that is humanization.md), typo or grammar fixes (sanitize-text + humanization-check), fact-checking (/validate), artifact grading (/evaluate), short chat replies, or atomic /zk notes.