manuscript-reframe

# /manuscript-reframe - Scientific Manuscript Reframing ## Purpose Turn a technically valid but report-like manuscript into a scientific paper argument. Use this when a draft contains many modules, raw tables, internal artifact language, scattered figures, or exploratory AI/report-generation material but the scientific gap and contribution are not yet crisp. ## Trigger Words This skill activates on: `manuscript reframe`, `paper form`, `too much like a report`, `gap and contribution`, `scientific framing`, `journal framing`, `submission clean`, `methods paper`, `/manuscript-reframe`. ## Core Rule Write around the scientific problem, not the implementation inventory. Reframing may reorganise the manuscript argument. It may not silently redefine the real-world problem, intended use, research object, core question, primary experiment, contribution order, headline claim, or evidence boundary. Treat changes to any of those items as an author decision, not as polishing. Before editing, force the draft into one sentence: ```text This paper solves [specific reliability / evidence / workflow gap] between [upstream technical output] and [downstream scientific or operator-facing use]. ``` If the sentence cannot be written, do not rewrite sections yet. First produce a gap-and-contribution diagnosis. ## Workflow ### 0. Lock Author Intent And The Reframe Contract Read the canonical `/thesis-control` intent and manuscript contract. For a lightweight project, read `00_AUTHOR_INTE...