reframelisted

# reframe Use this skill when a substantial analysis, recommendation, investigation, comparison, or exploratory conversation should become a durable Markdown report. The goal is not to summarize or prettify the source material. The goal is to use the change in structure as a second analytical pass: re-check the conclusion, test the assumptions, separate evidence from inference, and surface material gaps the original pass missed. ## When To Use - A conversation contains enough analysis that a reader should not have to reconstruct it from chat order. - A decision, recommendation, or assessment needs to stand alone. - The user asks to make an analysis durable, turn it into a report, or write it up. - A structured second pass may reveal a weak assumption, contradiction, missing risk, or better recommendation. Do not use this for simple factual answers, short rewrites, status updates, transcripts, or cases where structure adds no value. ## Output Produce one Markdown report. It should be readable by someone who did not see the original conversation. Prefer this section set, then adapt it to the problem: - `Objective` - `Key Findings` - `Analysis` - `Risks and Gaps` - `Recommendations` - `Open Questions` - `Structured Review Findings` Only include `Structured Review Findings` when the second pass found something material: a changed conclusion, contradiction, missing evidence, weak assumption, or important omission. If the second pass changes nothing, leave that section ou