think

Featured

Turns rough ideas into approved, decision-complete plans with validated structure before coding. Use when users ask in any language for planning, architecture, design direction, feasibility, value judgment, or whether a feature is worth doing before implementation. Not for bug fixes or small edits.

Code & Development 6,643 stars 392 forks Updated yesterday MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 95/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Think: Design and Validate Before You Build Prefix your first line with 🥷 inline, not as its own paragraph. Turn a rough idea into an approved plan. No code, no scaffolding, no pseudo-code until the user approves. Give opinions directly. Take a position and state what evidence would change it. Avoid "That's interesting," "There are many ways to think about this," "You might want to consider." ## Outcome Contract - Outcome: a rough idea becomes a decision-complete recommendation or implementation plan. - Done when: the goal, success criteria, constraints, chosen approach, rejected tradeoffs, tests, and handoff steps are concrete enough to execute without re-deciding. - Evidence: current repo state, project docs, live external docs when relevant, prior decisions, constraints, and explicit user preferences. - Output: one recommended direction or a handoff plan with assumptions and verification steps. ## Durable Context Preflight See [references/durable-context.md](references/durable-context.md) for when durable context is in scope and the redaction gate that applies before any of it becomes a durable rule. For `/think`: current repo state and live docs override memory. Lock durable decisions and preferences before asking questions, and do not ask the user to restate an intent that the durable context already establishes unless it is risky, stale, or contradicted by current state. Before outputting any plan, scan the project's `AGENTS.md`, `CLAUDE.md`, `.claude/rules/...

Details

Author
tw93
Repository
tw93/Waza
Created
4 months ago
Last Updated
yesterday
Language
Python
License
MIT

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

think

Turns rough ideas into approved plans with validated structure before writing code. Covers new features, architecture decisions, and value judgments about whether to build, keep, or remove something. Not for bug fixes or small edits.

2 Updated 3 days ago
0xUrsanomics
Code & Development Solid

think

Use before planning when you need strategic clarity — product discovery, scope decisions, premise validation. Applies YC-grade product thinking to challenge assumptions and find the smallest starting point. Supports --autopilot to run the full sprint automatically after approval. Use --retro after a sprint to reflect on what shipped. Triggers on /think, /office-hours, /ceo-review.

1 Updated today
Jihadyip286
AI & Automation Solid

plan-create

Propose a phased, gated implementation plan before any work begins. Trigger when the user runs /plan-create, says "make a plan", "plan this out", "design before coding", "let's plan first", "architect this", or asks for a phased approach before implementation. Also trigger proactively when a task is complex enough that jumping straight to execution would be risky — multi-file changes, new features, architectural shifts, refactors spanning multiple components, or any task where misalignment early would be expensive to fix later. Output: a structured PLAN.md with phases, changes, risks, and verification criteria. Design only — no implementation code is written during /plan-create. Use plan-phases to restructure an existing plan, plan-execute to run an approved plan, plan-deep-dive to inspect a plan, plan-evolve to evolve shipped work, and plan-cleanup after execution.

0 Updated today
allemaar