test-evidence-review
SolidQuality review of test files and manual evidence documents. Goes beyond existence checks — evaluates assertion coverage, edge case handling, naming conventions, and evidence completeness. Produces ADEQUATE/INCOMPLETE/MISSING verdict per story. Run before QA sign-off or on demand.
Install
Quality Score: 91/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- striderZA
- Repository
- striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios
- Created
- 2 months ago
- Last Updated
- 4 days ago
- Language
- JavaScript
- License
- MIT
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
test-review
A focused, single-lens review of test quality and coverage for a change — does the test actually exercise the new behavior AND its failure modes, or does it merely pass? Hunts happy-path-only coverage, weak assertions, tests that pass even when the code is wrong, over-mocking that tests the mock, missing negative/edge/error cases, flakiness, and tests coupled to implementation detail. Every finding asks "would this test fail if I broke the code?", cites file:line, a severity, why it matters, and the concrete missing case or stronger assertion.
test-review
Review missing cases, regression coverage, flaky patterns, fixture quality, edge cases, and behavior-versus-implementation testing.
core-evidence-based-qa
Evidence-based quality assurance doctrine for {{PROJECT_NAME}}. Teaches the reasoning behind test-signal discipline — when a defect may be declared fixed, how to interpret coverage numbers without coverage-washing, why mutation score outranks line coverage as a quality signal, and how to produce reviewer-trusted sign-offs that cite verifiable evidence rather than assertions. Use when performing QA review, classifying regressions, evaluating test quality, interpreting CI output, or any time an agent claims "tests pass" or "bug fixed" and must back that claim.