design-review
SolidReviews a game design document for completeness, internal consistency, implementability, and adherence to project design standards. Run this before handing a design document to programmers.
Install
Quality Score: 87/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- striderZA
- Repository
- striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios
- Created
- 4 months ago
- Last Updated
- 1 months ago
- Language
- JavaScript
- License
- MIT
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
post-design-review
Review a game design document from an implementer's perspective — check self-consistency, playability, buildability, and codebase gaps. Use after writing a design doc, or when you want to validate an existing design against the current codebase.
review-all-gdds
Holistic cross-GDD consistency and game design review. Reads all system GDDs simultaneously and checks for contradictions between them, stale references, ownership conflicts, formula incompatibilities, and game design theory violations (dominant strategies, economic imbalance, cognitive overload, pillar drift). Run after all MVP GDDs are written, before architecture begins.
game-design-review
Review, critique, compare, improve, or stress-test an existing game concept, GDD, mechanic, puzzle, economy, level, theme, emotional arc, interface, narrative, social feature, prototype, pitch, or playtest result. Use when the user asks what is weak, risky, unclear, unbalanced, contradictory, insufficiently engaging, or worth validating next in a game design. Produce evidence-based findings, explicit tradeoffs, and the smallest useful prototype or playtest experiment.