battle-tested-engineer
SolidEngineering judgment for code write/refactor/test and frontend UI. Trigger on code review, legacy cleanup, tests, UI with data, bloat/over-engineer complaints — even with no explicit mention, before any diff/rewrite/test suite. Output ultra-terse caveman style; code, commits, PR desc, security warnings stay normal prose.
Install
Quality Score: 81/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- sayeed1999
- Repository
- sayeed1999/agent-skills
- Created
- 3 weeks ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- N/A
- License
- MIT
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
engineering-principles
Core code-quality rules — YAGNI, KISS, DRY with judgment, small single-purpose units, clear naming, minimal-scope diffs. Preload into implementer agents and consult during any code review. Use whenever writing, refactoring, or reviewing code.
engineering-craft
Use when writing or changing any production code or tests — new features, bug fixes, refactors, or test authoring, in any language, by any model on any CLI.
engineering-craft
Use on every code delivery to hold the structural-quality bar — reusability where repetition is real, clear boundaries, explicit error handling, focused units, honest names, and tests for real logic. Invoke whenever you implement a claimed ticket and want the change to read like production code the repo's maintainers would approve, not a quick hack that merely passes. A cross-cutting lens that composes with `minimalism` (least code) and whatever build skill the ticket needs. For "make this reusable / well-structured", "production quality", "don't leave a hack".