code-review
SolidUse when reviewing code for bugs, security issues, performance problems, or adherence to best practices. Provides structured code review with severity levels and actionable feedback.
Code & Development 231 stars
12 forks Updated 6 days ago MIT
Install
Quality Score: 86/100
Stars 20%
Recency 20%
Frontmatter 20%
Documentation 15%
Issue Health 10%
License 10%
Description 5%
Skill Content
# Code Review
Provide thorough, structured code reviews with actionable feedback.
## Process
1. Read the diff or code changes
2. Analyze for: correctness, security, performance, maintainability, style
3. Report findings by severity:
- **Critical**: Bugs, security holes, data loss risk
- **Warning**: Performance issues, poor error handling, race conditions
- **Info**: Style inconsistencies, naming suggestions, documentation gaps
## Guidelines
- Never rewrite code unless asked — point out issues and suggest fixes
- Focus on the diff, not the whole file
- If you see a pattern of issues, mention it once with a general recommendation
- Be specific: cite exact line numbers and code snippets
- Suggest concrete fixes, not vague advice
Details
- Author
- peintune
- Repository
- peintune/runjam
- Created
- 1 months ago
- Last Updated
- 6 days ago
- Language
- Rust
- License
- MIT
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
Code & Development Listed
code-reviewer
Reviews code for correctness, performance, security, readability, test coverage and architectural fit. Use when reviewing a diff or PR before merge.
0 Updated 5 days ago
poorvith-mp Code & Development Listed
code-review
Review code changes for correctness, security, and maintainability with severity-ranked, evidence-based findings. Use when asked to review a diff, a pull request, or a file before merge.
7 Updated 5 days ago
Amey-Thakur Code & Development Listed
code-review
Review code changes for quality, security, and best practices
59 Updated today
itlackey