code-review

Solid

Reviews code diffs and files for security vulnerabilities (OWASP Top 10), error handling, complexity, naming conventions, and performance issues. Use when the user asks to review a PR, pull request, diff, merge request, or code changes.

Code & Development 499 stars 105 forks Updated 5 days ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 95/100

Stars 20%
90
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
51
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Code Review ## Instructions When reviewing code: 1. Read the full diff or file provided 2. Check for security vulnerabilities (OWASP Top 10) 3. Evaluate error handling completeness 4. Assess code complexity and readability 5. Verify naming conventions and code style 6. Look for performance issues 7. Check for proper input validation ## Output Format ``` ## Review Summary [1-2 sentence overview] ## Findings ### CRITICAL - [Finding with line reference and fix] ### WARNING - [Finding with line reference and fix] ### SUGGESTION - [Finding with line reference and fix] ## What's Done Well - [Positive observations] ``` ### Example Finding ``` ### CRITICAL - **Line 42**: SQL injection vulnerability — user input concatenated directly into query string. Fix: Use parameterized queries instead of string concatenation. ```python # Before (vulnerable) cursor.execute(f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}") # After (safe) cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = %s", (user_id,)) ``` ```

Details

Author
open-gitagent
Repository
open-gitagent/gitagent
Created
3 months ago
Last Updated
5 days ago
Language
TypeScript
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category