nw-abr-critique-dimensions
SolidReview dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
Testing & QA 542 stars
57 forks Updated yesterday NOASSERTION
Install
Quality Score: 87/100
Stars 20%
Recency 20%
Frontmatter 20%
Documentation 15%
Issue Health 10%
License 10%
Description 5%
Skill Content
# Agent Quality Critique Dimensions
Use these dimensions when reviewing or validating agent definitions.
## Dimension 1: Template Compliance
Does the agent follow official Claude Code format?
**Check**: YAML frontmatter with name and description (required) | Markdown body as system prompt | No embedded YAML config blocks | No activation-instructions or IDE-FILE-RESOLUTION sections | Skills referenced in frontmatter, not inline
**Severity**: High -- non-compliant agents may not load correctly.
## Dimension 2: Size and Focus
**Check**: Core definition under 400 lines | Domain knowledge in Skills | Single clear responsibility | No monolithic sections (>50 lines without structure) | No redundant Claude default behaviors
**Measurement**: `wc -l {agent-file}`. Target: 200-400 lines.
**Severity**: High -- oversized agents suffer context rot.
## Dimension 3: Divergence Quality
Does the agent specify only what diverges from Claude defaults?
**Check**: No file operation instructions | No generic quality principles ("be thorough") | No tool usage guidelines | Core principles are domain-specific and non-obvious | Each instruction justifies why Claude wouldn't do this naturally
**Severity**: Medium -- redundant instructions waste tokens, cause overtriggering.
## Dimension 4: Safety Implementation
**Check**: Tools restricted via frontmatter `tools` field | maxTurns set | No prose-based security layers (use hooks) | No embedded enterprise safety frameworks | permissionMode se...
Details
- Author
- nWave-ai
- Repository
- nWave-ai/nWave
- Created
- 3 months ago
- Last Updated
- yesterday
- Language
- Python
- License
- NOASSERTION
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
Testing & QA Listed
nw-ab-critique-dimensions
Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation
542 Updated yesterday
nWave-ai Code & Development Listed
nw-sc-review-dimensions
Reviewer critique dimensions for peer review - implementation bias detection, test quality validation, completeness checks, and priority validation
542 Updated yesterday
nWave-ai Testing & QA Listed
nw-ad-critique-dimensions
Review dimensions for acceptance test quality - happy path bias, GWT compliance, business language purity, coverage completeness, walking skeleton user-centricity, priority validation, observable behavior assertions, traceability coverage, and walking skeleton boundary proof
542 Updated yesterday
nWave-ai