constructive-thinking
SolidCompress chaotic information into a leader-ready structure before output. ALWAYS use when the user is preparing to brief a senior leader, present a technical proposal, write a one-pager, or otherwise turn scattered facts and feelings into Frame → Crux → Nodes → Tilt + Reasoning that fits in 3–5 minutes of reading. Trigger phrases include "向领导汇报", "做技���方案 presentation", "整理思路", "report up", "brief the boss", "summarize for leadership", "executive briefing", "one-pager". NOT for writing the final polished document (use tech-doc-writer), NOT for decomposing tasks into implementation steps (use writing-plans), NOT for incident root-cause analysis (use incident-postmortem), NOT for aggregating research with citations (use deep-research).
Install
Quality Score: 85/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- johnqtcg
- Repository
- johnqtcg/awesome-skills
- Created
- 6 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- Python
- License
- MIT
Integrates with
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
think
Use when you have a rough idea and want it sharpened before any code is written. Refines the idea through questions, one at a time. Explores 2-3 approaches with trade-offs. Walks the design with you, section by section. Saves a brief your next steps read. Still challenges scope and finds the smallest starting point. Supports --autopilot to run the full sprint automatically after approval. Use --retro after a sprint to reflect on what shipped. Triggers on /think, /office-hours, /ceo-review.
thinking
Decision-framing workflow for turning an ambiguous problem or open choice into a recommendation, experiment, or concrete next move. Use when the user wants to explore a vague idea, compare plausible approaches, understand system trade-offs, or decide what to do. Do not use for sustained brainstorming, when the decision is already settled and the remaining work is only implementation, or adversarial review of an existing candidate (use recursive-thinking).
executive-summary
Executive summary authoring discipline covering Pyramid Principle (Minto SCQ), one-page architecture, decision-enabling structure, audience-aware compression, and the never-bury-bad-news rule. Applies answer-first sequencing, cognitive-economy writing, and named-owner recommendation framing to all outputs. Distinct from `domains/sales/skills/proposal-strategist` (persuasion-to-close focus) and `domains/business-support/skills/analytics-reporter` (data-narrative focus). Use when: converting a lengthy analysis or briefing into a board-ready one-page summary; structuring a decision memo for C-suite consumption; compressing a multi-team status report for executive review; or authoring a risk or incident summary that must be readable in under three minutes.