engineering-wisdom
FeaturedProvide an explicitly requested, repository-grounded engineering review using contextual heuristics for code clarity, SOLID and design, testing, refactoring, architecture, and professional practice. Use only when the user invokes `$engineering-wisdom` or explicitly asks for this installed engineering-wisdom pack; do not turn its advice into repository policy or automatically rewrite an application architecture.
Install
Quality Score: 92/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- hoangnb24
- Repository
- hoangnb24/repository-harness
- Created
- 2 months ago
- Last Updated
- yesterday
- Language
- Rust
- License
- MIT
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
michel-packmind-engineer-review
Review an implemented GitHub issue the way a senior Packmind engineer would — the human-judgment checks that ESLint, the TypeScript compiler, and e2e tests cannot catch (authorization scoping, hexagonal-architecture conformance, analytics-event wiring, UX copy, UI reactivity, CLI behavior, multi-tenancy safety, and more). Use this skill once an issue has been implemented and you have a diff to inspect — before opening or merging the PR. Trigger on 'review this implementation', 'engineer review', 'packmind review', 'QC this issue', 'is this issue done well', 'review issue #NNN', or any post-implementation quality gate. Reach for it even when the user just says the work is done and asks 'anything I missed?' — automated checks already ran; this is the layer they don't cover.
engineering-fundamentals
Engineering fundamentals reference covering requirements clarity, design integrity, code-level quality, test design, verification and validation, and metric thresholds. Use whenever the project contains source files in any compiled or scripted language (`.js`, `.ts`, `.py`, `.rb`, `.go`, `.rs`, `.java`, `.sh`, etc.), OR the user asks about code quality, design principles, SOLID, DRY, KISS, requirements clarity, test design, metrics, or any engineering review, audit, plan, or refactor task, even if "principles" or "fundamentals" are not mentioned by name.
battle-tested-engineer
Engineering judgment for code write/refactor/test and frontend UI. Trigger on code review, legacy cleanup, tests, UI with data, bloat/over-engineer complaints — even with no explicit mention, before any diff/rewrite/test suite. Output ultra-terse caveman style; code, commits, PR desc, security warnings stay normal prose.