review-code

Solid

Review a change along one specific quality dimension — bugs, design, simplicity, maintainability, testability, test quality, type safety, contracts, operational readiness, docs, prose value, change intent, or CLAUDE.md adherence. Loads exactly one dimension reference and audits the diff against it, returning a structured PASS/FAIL report with severities. Use when verifying a change before merge, auditing a diff for a named concern, or running a manifest acceptance gate.

Code & Development 73 stars 10 forks Updated 3 days ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 87/100

Stars 20%
62
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# review-code — one dimension per invocation Audit a change along **one** review dimension and report findings. This skill is the single home for the quality reviewers that used to be separate agents; each dimension's detection content lives in its own reference file and loads only when requested (progressive disclosure). ## Input `$ARGUMENTS` carries the **dimension** plus optional scope, e.g. `dimension=code-bugs` or `code-bugs src/foo.ts`. Manifest gate instructions activate this skill with the dimension under `/do`'s selected evaluator. If no dimension is given, list the available dimensions and ask which one — never audit "everything at once"; one invocation = one dimension. ## Dimensions and thresholds Load `references/<dimension>.md` for the requested dimension and follow it. The threshold is the bar a change must clear to PASS on that dimension: | Dimension | Reference | Role | Threshold (PASS requires) | |-----------|-----------|------|---------------------------| | `change-intent` | `references/change-intent.md` | defect-finder | no LOW-or-higher findings | | `code-bugs` | `references/code-bugs.md` | defect-finder | no LOW-or-higher findings | | `contracts` | `references/contracts.md` | defect-finder | no LOW-or-higher findings | | `type-safety` | `references/type-safety.md` | defect-finder | no LOW-or-higher findings | | `operational-readiness` | `references/operational-readiness.md` | advisory | no MEDIUM-or-higher findings | | `code-design` | `references/co...

Details

Author
doodledood
Repository
doodledood/manifest-dev
Created
7 months ago
Last Updated
3 days ago
Language
Python
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Code & Development Listed

code-review

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, PR, or merge-base) on two axes — Standards (does it follow this repo's documented rules?) and Spec (does it do what the originating issue asked?). Each axis returns a verdict per enumerated item rather than an open-ended list of findings, so a round terminates. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, working-tree changes, or asks to "review since X"; and again after fixes, to review the fix.

20 Updated today
ConnorGriffin
Code & Development Featured

code-review

Review the diff since a fixed point along two axes — Conventions (does the code follow this repo's coding standards and Tidy First practices?) and Intent (does the change do what it claims to do?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when you want to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or ask to "review since X".

120 Updated today
jellydn
AI & Automation Listed

review

Judge finished work and return severity-rated findings, each anchored to a file:line that was actually read. Three axes: `--scope diff|repo|plan` (what is under review — a change, a whole codebase, or a plan before anyone builds it), `--lens security|a11y|claims` (narrow to one question), `--deep` (parallel specialists with every finding adversarially verified, instead of one pass). Defaults to a single pass over the current diff. Use for reviewing a diff or PR, auditing a codebase, checking whether a plan is sound, asking whether the documentation is true, or on 'schau dir das mal an', 'review das', 'ist der Code gut', 'stimmt das so'.

0 Updated 3 days ago
juliuswiener