prose-style

Featured

Reusable writing-style contract for agent outputs (reports, ARCH docs, verdicts, threat models). Forces direct prose with concrete evidence, no marketing voice, no hedge words. The single most-referenced skill across the pipeline — used by 28 agents.

Code & Development 92 stars 13 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 91/100

Stars 20%
66
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Prose style — writing contract for agent reports great_cto reports are read by busy CTOs at 3pm on a Tuesday. They scan for facts, decisions, and what needs their attention. Marketing voice and hedge words waste their time. ## Five rules ### 1. Lead with the conclusion Bad: > After reviewing the architecture document and considering various > trade-offs, including but not limited to scalability, security, and > maintainability, we believe that the proposed approach is generally > acceptable but has some areas that could potentially be improved. Good: > Approved with 2 changes required: (a) move PII encryption to KMS, (b) > add idempotency key on webhook handler. Details below. ### 2. Concrete evidence, not adjectives Bad: "Performance is acceptable." Good: "p99 latency 142ms over 50K requests (k6 run 2026-05-12 14:00 UTC, `tests/load/<your-scenario>.js`). SLO is 200ms." Bad: "Security looks good." Good: "No findings at Critical or High. 2 Medium: hardcoded log level in `src/logger.ts:14`, missing CORS header in `src/middleware/cors.ts:8`." ### 3. No hedge words Banned: *generally, somewhat, fairly, mostly, kind of, sort of, more or less, in some cases, often, sometimes, occasionally, possibly, perhaps, maybe, could potentially, might want to consider*. Replace with specifics or omit. If you genuinely don't know, say "uncertain because <reason>" — that's information. ### 4. No filler openings Banned: - "In this document, we will discuss..." - "It's important to ...

Details

Author
avelikiy
Repository
avelikiy/great_cto
Created
5 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
JavaScript
License
MIT

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

prose-standard

Write prose that preserves every contract while deleting reasoning transcripts, repetition, and decoration — across comments, JSDoc, docs, prompts, diagnostics, and user-visible strings. Use when writing, reviewing, trimming, restoring, or auditing prose, or deciding where documentation or a comment is required. It owns two rules: preserve the complete proposition, and never let an authoring-session vantage leak into durable text.

4 Updated 3 weeks ago
arch3rPro
Data & Documents Listed

beautiful-prose

A hard-edged style contract for prose that cannot be identified as AI-generated. Governs writing and rewriting at four levels (phrase, sentence, structure, idea) so output is clean, exact, concrete, rhythmically alive, and free of AI cadence, filler, hedging, and therapeutic tone. Use for ANY task where prose quality matters or the writing must read as human, including essays, memos, op-eds, letters, speeches, blog posts, newsletters, personal statements, founder or marketing copy, fiction, and rewrites. Also trigger on requests like "make this sound human," "less AI," "remove the AI tone," "punchier," "sharper," "more elegant," "tighten this up," or "no slop," even when the user never names the skill.

0 Updated 1 months ago
andrewr303
AI & Automation Listed

prose-clarity

Rewrite and self-check drafted prose against a machine-checkable clarity standard derived from ASD-STE100 (Simplified Technical English) — no marketing adjectives, no phrasal verbs, no semicolons, active voice, short sentences, and a required carve-out for the epistemic hedge markers the evidence ledger depends on. Use when drafting any package document's prose, before returning a draft, or when an independent verification pass evaluates editorial quality. This skill MUST be consulted because a banned-word list alone barely moves AI slop — the habits that produce it (hedge-stacking, nominalization) generate new slop the list never anticipated — and only rules a script can verify hold up under revision.

6 Updated today
synaptiai