magpie-reviewer-routing
SolidGiven an open issue or PR, scores the project's configured reviewer roster across three signals — touched-area eligibility, git-history familiarity with the changed paths, and current open-review load — and proposes a primary reviewer (plus an optional backup). Read-only and propose-then-confirm: nothing is assigned, labelled, or requested without the maintainer's explicit confirmation. An unresolved roster produces an explicit NO ELIGIBLE REVIEWER signal, never a fabricated handle.
Install
Quality Score: 84/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- apache
- Repository
- apache/magpie
- Created
- 4 months ago
- Last Updated
- today
- Language
- Python
- License
- Apache-2.0
Bundled in these plugins
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
magpie-pr-management-code-review
Walk a maintainer through deep, sequential code review of open pull requests on the configured `<upstream>` repo. Defaults to the **"my reviews"** queue (the union of five maintainer signals — see the Inputs table); selectors can narrow to a single PR, an area label, or a collaborator subset. Drafts an `approve` / `request-changes` / `comment` review per PR and posts on the maintainer's confirmation.
magpie-pr-management-triage
Sweep open pull requests on the configured `<upstream>` repo, classify each one against the project's quality criteria, propose a disposition, and — on the maintainer's confirmation — carry out the action via `gh`. Disposition options per PR: draft / comment / close / rebase / CI-rerun / workflow-approve / ping-stale-reviewer / request author confirmation of readiness / mark `ready for maintainer review` / promote bot-authored draft. Does **not** perform code review — that lives in `pr-management-code-review`.
review
Review PRs and repo health with one skill, three modes. Default: recap the session's goal, discover every PR it opened, and review/merge each in dependency order. Given PR number(s): a deep sub-agent review (not the author) with file:line grounding, an architecture rubric (reuse, cross-cutting-at-source, no duplicate surfaces, doc-asserted invariants), and a security pass on risk-touching diffs. Given `repo` / a path / `--since <date>`: a read-only whole-repo architecture-and-quality diagnostic (four orthogonal categories, HTML report, no merge verdict). Triggers on: 'review the PR', 'code review', 'review #N', 'before I merge', 'block this PR', 'security review', 'what's wrong with this branch', 'health check', 'parallel implementations', 'audit drift'.