ai-act-readiness

Solid

/cs:ai-act-readiness <system> — EU AI Act 6-question forcing interrogation. Use during AI-system intake, before EU deployment, or during annual compliance refresh as Article 113 obligations phase in (2025-02-02 / 2025-08-02 / 2026-08-02 / 2027-08-02).

AI & Automation 16,782 stars 2310 forks Updated 3 days ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 93/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# /cs:ai-act-readiness — EU AI Act Forcing Questions **Command:** `/cs:ai-act-readiness <system>` The EU AI Act compliance operator pressure-tests any AI system before EU deployment. Six Article-cited questions before any EU placement, conformity assessment, or annual compliance refresh. ## When to Run - During AI-system intake review (per new system or material change) - Before placing an AI system on the EU market - Before signing the EU declaration of conformity (Article 47) - During annual compliance refresh (Article 113 phasing brings new obligations) - When the organization's role changes (deployer becomes provider via Article 25(1) substantial modification) - When training compute approaches 10^25 FLOPs (Article 51 systemic-risk threshold) ## The Six EU AI Act Questions ### 1. Article 5: Is this a prohibited AI practice? **Penalty: up to 35M EUR or 7% worldwide turnover.** - 8 categories: subliminal manipulation, exploitation of vulnerabilities, social scoring, predictive policing, untargeted facial scraping, emotion recognition in workplace/education, biometric categorisation by sensitive attributes, real-time public biometric ID by law enforcement - Run `ai_system_risk_classifier.py` - If yes → STOP. Cannot place on EU market. No exceptions outside Article 5(2) carve-outs. ### 2. Article 6 + Annex III: Is this high-risk? **Annex III triggers high-risk; Article 6(3) carve-out conditional.** - 8 categories: biometrics, critical infrastructure, education, employm...

Details

Author
alirezarezvani
Repository
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Created
7 months ago
Last Updated
3 days ago
Language
Python
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

eu-ai-act

EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) compliance advisor — risk classification across all four tiers, all 9 prohibited practices (Art. 5, including the nudification/CSAM prohibition added by the AI Omnibus May 2026), all 8 Annex III high-risk use case areas, provider and deployer obligations (Arts. 9–17, 26), GPAI model obligations including the July 2025 Code of Practice (Arts. 51–55), conformity assessment and CE marking (Arts. 43–48), EU AI database registration, Art. 50 transparency (chatbots, synthetic media, AI-generated content), governance (AI Office, AI Board), penalties (Art. 99), updated phase-in timeline (AI Omnibus extended Annex III to 2 Dec 2027 and Annex I to 2 Aug 2028), and cross-framework mapping to ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and GDPR. Use for any EU AI regulation, AI system classification, or AI compliance question. Current as of May 2026.

490 Updated today
Sushegaad
AI & Automation Listed

ai-act-high-risk

EU AI Act High-Risk Classification — depth assessment of whether an AI system is high-risk under Art. 6 AI Act, grounded in the Commission's draft Art. 6(5) classification guidelines (general principles + Annex I + Annex III). This skill should be used when the user asks to "assess high-risk status under the AI Act", "check Annex I", "check Annex III", "apply the Art. 6 classification", "check Art. 6(3) exception", "is our AI system high-risk", "perform safety component analysis", "check third-party conformity assessment trigger", or mentions "Hochrisiko-Einstufung", "Hochrisiko-KI-System", "Sicherheitsbauteil", "Anhang I", "Anhang III", "Anhang III Nr. X" under the AI Act. For broad risk-tier classification (prohibited / high-risk / GPAI / limited / minimal), use ai-act-classifier; for Q&A and article lookup, use ai-act-knowledge.

1 Updated 2 days ago
oliverschmidtprietz
AI & Automation Solid

aims-audit

/cs:aims-audit <scope> — ISO/IEC 42001 AIMS internal-audit 6-question forcing interrogation. Use before certification stage 1, before annual internal audit cycles, or when onboarding a new AI system into an existing AIMS.

16,782 Updated 3 days ago
alirezarezvani
AI & Automation Solid

caio-review

/cs:caio-review <plan> — Eval-demanding Chief AI Officer interrogation of any plan that involves AI: model selection, risk classification, cost economics, or AI hiring.

16,782 Updated 3 days ago
alirezarezvani
AI & Automation Listed

ai-regulation

Use when identifying AI-specific regulations and compliance requirements that apply to AI/ML-powered software products. Covers the EU AI Act, US AI executive orders, China's AI regulations, and emerging global frameworks with risk classification and compliance obligations. USE FOR: EU AI Act, AI regulation, AI risk classification, AI transparency, AI liability, algorithmic accountability, AI ethics compliance, US AI executive orders, China AI rules, AI auditing requirements DO NOT USE FOR: AI security vulnerabilities (use security/ai-security), ML model development (use AI skills), responsible AI ethics without legal dimension (use security/ai-security)

10 Updated 3 months ago
Tyler-R-Kendrick