eu-ai-act

Solid

EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) compliance advisor — risk classification across all four tiers, all 9 prohibited practices (Art. 5, including the nudification/CSAM prohibition added by the AI Omnibus May 2026), all 8 Annex III high-risk use case areas, provider and deployer obligations (Arts. 9–17, 26), GPAI model obligations including the July 2025 Code of Practice (Arts. 51–55), conformity assessment and CE marking (Arts. 43–48), EU AI database registration, Art. 50 transparency (chatbots, synthetic media, AI-generated content), governance (AI Office, AI Board), penalties (Art. 99), updated phase-in timeline (AI Omnibus extended Annex III to 2 Dec 2027 and Annex I to 2 Aug 2028), and cross-framework mapping to ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and GDPR. Use for any EU AI regulation, AI system classification, or AI compliance question. Current as of May 2026.

AI & Automation 490 stars 104 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 91/100

Stars 20%
90
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# EU AI Act — Compliance Advisor You are an expert EU AI Act compliance advisor with deep knowledge of **Regulation (EU) 2024/1689**, its Annexes, Recitals, and all implementing measures. Every response cites the governing Article, Annex, or Recital. ## 8-Step Workflow **1 → Scope & Role Identification** Determine whether the user is a **provider** (develops/places AI on market), **deployer** (uses AI under own authority), **importer**, **distributor**, or **authorised representative** (Art. 3). Identify the Member State(s) of operation. **2 → AI System / GPAI Classification** Confirm the system meets the Art. 3(1) definition of an AI system. If it involves a model trained at scale for multiple tasks, assess whether it is a **GPAI model** (Art. 3(63)) and whether it crosses the systemic risk threshold (Art. 51: ≥10²⁵ FLOPs training compute). **3 → Prohibited Practices Screen (Art. 5)** The original 8 prohibited categories applied from **2 February 2025**: subliminal manipulation, vulnerability exploitation, social scoring, predictive criminal assessment, untargeted biometric database scraping, workplace/education emotion inference, sensitive-attribute biometric categorisation, and real-time RBI in public spaces (law enforcement). A **9th prohibition** added by the AI Omnibus applies from **2 December 2026**: AI systems capable of generating non-consensual sexually explicit imagery or child sexual abuse material (CSAM). A safe harbour applies if the system has effective ...

Details

Author
Sushegaad
Repository
Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance
Created
2 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
HTML
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

ai-act-readiness

/cs:ai-act-readiness <system> — EU AI Act 6-question forcing interrogation. Use during AI-system intake, before EU deployment, or during annual compliance refresh as Article 113 obligations phase in (2025-02-02 / 2025-08-02 / 2026-08-02 / 2027-08-02).

16,782 Updated 3 days ago
alirezarezvani
AI & Automation Listed

ai-regulation

Use when identifying AI-specific regulations and compliance requirements that apply to AI/ML-powered software products. Covers the EU AI Act, US AI executive orders, China's AI regulations, and emerging global frameworks with risk classification and compliance obligations. USE FOR: EU AI Act, AI regulation, AI risk classification, AI transparency, AI liability, algorithmic accountability, AI ethics compliance, US AI executive orders, China AI rules, AI auditing requirements DO NOT USE FOR: AI security vulnerabilities (use security/ai-security), ML model development (use AI skills), responsible AI ethics without legal dimension (use security/ai-security)

10 Updated 3 months ago
Tyler-R-Kendrick
AI & Automation Listed

ai-act-high-risk

EU AI Act High-Risk Classification — depth assessment of whether an AI system is high-risk under Art. 6 AI Act, grounded in the Commission's draft Art. 6(5) classification guidelines (general principles + Annex I + Annex III). This skill should be used when the user asks to "assess high-risk status under the AI Act", "check Annex I", "check Annex III", "apply the Art. 6 classification", "check Art. 6(3) exception", "is our AI system high-risk", "perform safety component analysis", "check third-party conformity assessment trigger", or mentions "Hochrisiko-Einstufung", "Hochrisiko-KI-System", "Sicherheitsbauteil", "Anhang I", "Anhang III", "Anhang III Nr. X" under the AI Act. For broad risk-tier classification (prohibited / high-risk / GPAI / limited / minimal), use ai-act-classifier; for Q&A and article lookup, use ai-act-knowledge.

1 Updated 2 days ago
oliverschmidtprietz
AI & Automation Listed

employee-ai-policy

Use when reviewing a draft internal employee AI-use policy — or drafting review criteria when no policy exists — to identify gaps, inconsistencies, and priority issues for attorney and HR review.

1 Updated 3 days ago
zgbrenner
AI & Automation Solid

ai-ethics

Responsible AI development and ethical considerations. Use when evaluating AI bias, implementing fairness measures, conducting ethical assessments, or ensuring AI systems align with human values.

335 Updated today
aiskillstore