code-review-orchestration

Solid

6-agent parallel code review orchestration covering architecture, security, performance, testing, quality, and documentation dimensions with weighted scoring.

Code & Development 1,160 stars 71 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 94/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
72
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Code Review Orchestration ## Overview Orchestrates 6 specialized review agents running in parallel across independent dimensions. Each agent scores independently, and results are aggregated into a weighted final score with a clear recommendation. ## Six Dimensions ### Architecture (weight: 20%) Module boundaries, dependency direction, design pattern adherence, architectural drift. ### Security (weight: 25%) Injection vulnerabilities, auth, secrets, crypto, dependencies, headers. ### Performance (weight: 15%) Algorithmic complexity, resource leaks, database patterns, caching, async. ### Testing (weight: 15%) Coverage, quality, edge cases, isolation, flakiness, integration, error paths. ### Quality (weight: 15%) Naming, readability, error handling, type safety, DRY, comments. ### Documentation (weight: 10%) JSDoc, README updates, changelog, inline comments, type documentation. ## Scoring and Recommendation - **APPROVE**: overall >= 80 AND zero critical issues - **REQUEST_CHANGES**: overall >= 60 OR has critical issues - **REJECT**: overall < 60 ## When to Use - `/code-review` slash command - Post-implementation review in spec execution - Pre-merge quality gate ## Agents Used - `code-review-coordinator`, `security-analyst`, `performance-analyst` - `testing-specialist`, `architecture-reviewer` ## Processes Used By - `claudekit-code-review` (primary consumer) - `claudekit-orchestrator` (via command dispatch)

Details

Author
a5c-ai
Repository
a5c-ai/babysitter
Created
4 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
JavaScript
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Code & Development Solid

when-reviewing-pull-request-orchestrate-comprehensive-code-revie

Use when conducting comprehensive code review for pull requests across multiple quality dimensions. Orchestrates 12-15 specialized reviewer agents across 4 phases using star topology coordination. Covers automated checks, parallel specialized reviews (quality, security, performance, architecture, documentation), integration analysis, and final merge recommendation in a 4-hour workflow.

335 Updated today
aiskillstore
Code & Development Listed

review

Run a comprehensive multi-perspective code review on recent changes. Also triggers on 'is this secure?', 'security review', 'check for vulnerabilities', 'could this be exploited?' for security-focused review.

0 Updated today
lethilu4796
Code & Development Listed

grumpy-review

Parallel-agent code review for quality, security, dependencies, and docs. Use for reviews, audits, or quality assessments. Produces deduplicated severity-ranked report.

1 Updated 3 days ago
lklimek
Code & Development Solid

review-code

Full code review: launches `/review-test-coverage`, `/review-correctness`, `/review-security`, `/review-quality`, `/review-api-usage`, and `/peer-review` in parallel and returns combined findings. Use when the user asks to "review my code", "full code review", "review my changes", or wants a comprehensive code review.

314 Updated today
tobihagemann
Code & Development Solid

when-reviewing-code-comprehensively-use-code-review-assistant

Comprehensive PR review with multi-agent swarm specialization for security, performance, style, tests, and documentation

335 Updated today
aiskillstore