design-submission-check

Featured

Audit a design-award submission package against the current official rules for a specific award cycle. Check required materials and technical constraints, cross-material facts and claims, rights and disclosure risks, and final submission readiness. Use when a user asks for a pre-submission check, compliance review, missing-material audit, consistency check, or final go/no-go decision. Do not use this skill to choose an award, retrieve winners, judge the design itself, rewrite the whole entry, or give a legal clearance opinion.

Web & Frontend 448 stars 12 forks Updated today Apache-2.0

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 91/100

Stars 20%
88
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Design Submission Check ## Purpose Determine whether a concrete design-award submission package is complete, internally consistent, and ready to submit under the current official rules for one exact award, track, category, and cycle. Return one of three decisions: - `Ready`: no Blocker or Important findings remain. - `Conditionally ready`: no Blocker remains, but one or more Important findings require attention. - `Not ready`: at least one Blocker remains. ## Scope Boundary - Convert current official submission rules into a project-specific checklist. - Check required files, fields, declarations, and technical constraints. - Compare names, facts, claims, credits, metrics, and versions across materials. - Screen rights, permissions, confidentiality, personal-data, and disclosure risks. - Perform a final package-level audit and prioritize fixes. - Stop after the audit. Do not select the award, score design quality, redesign the project, or perform comprehensive copy-editing. Use `$design-award-match` before this skill when the award, track, or category has not been selected. Route design-quality questions to `design-evaluation` and substantive redesign or rewriting to `design-optimization` when those skills are available. ## Severity Model Read [references/checking-framework.md](references/checking-framework.md). Classify every finding: - `Blocker`: likely prevents submission, violates an explicit hard rule, invalidates eligibility, or leaves a mandatory item absent...

Details

Author
SeanJ1ang
Repository
SeanJ1ang/design-judge-skills
Created
1 weeks ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Python
License
Apache-2.0

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Web & Frontend Featured

design-evaluation

Evaluate one design or a user-approved maturity-mapped batch through a transparent evidence-based rubric. Classify each work, score design quality and presentation, identify Critical risks, report evidence confidence, and optionally shortlist works within separate maturity tracks. Use when a user asks to judge, score, critique, review, diagnose, batch-evaluate, or rank designs by evidence-aligned evaluation score. Do not use this skill to retrieve winners, choose an award, produce a redesign, audit submission-file compliance, simulate an official jury, or predict winning probability.

448 Updated today
SeanJ1ang
Web & Frontend Featured

design-award-match

Match a design project to supported design-award programs, tracks, and entry categories; apply structural eligibility gates; verify current official rules; compare published criteria and cautiously described winner trends; and output fit, evidence confidence, and submission priority. Use when a user asks which award or category to enter, compares awards, or requests an award-fit analysis. Supports iF, iF Student, Red Dot Product, Red Dot Design Concept, IDEA, DIA, K-Design, GOOD DESIGN AWARD Japan, Core77, James Dyson, and EPDA. Do not use for winner retrieval alone, detailed submission-file compliance, general design evaluation, optimization, or winning-probability prediction.

448 Updated today
SeanJ1ang
Web & Frontend Listed

design-auditor

Audits designs across 19 professional categories including typography, color/contrast, spacing, visual hierarchy, consistency, WCAG, forms, motion, dark mode, responsive, loading/empty/error states, microcopy, i18n/RTL, elevation, iconography, navigation, design tokens, ethical design/dark patterns, and Nielsen heuristics. Scores 0-100 with severity-ranked issues.

0 Updated 1 weeks ago
podo