design-submission-check
FeaturedAudit a design-award submission package against the current official rules for a specific award cycle. Check required materials and technical constraints, cross-material facts and claims, rights and disclosure risks, and final submission readiness. Use when a user asks for a pre-submission check, compliance review, missing-material audit, consistency check, or final go/no-go decision. Do not use this skill to choose an award, retrieve winners, judge the design itself, rewrite the whole entry, or give a legal clearance opinion.
Install
Quality Score: 87/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- SeanJ1ang
- Repository
- SeanJ1ang/design-judge-skills
- Created
- 2 months ago
- Last Updated
- 1 months ago
- Language
- Python
- License
- Apache-2.0
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
design-evaluation
Evaluate one design or a user-approved maturity-mapped batch through a transparent evidence-based rubric. Classify each work, score design quality and presentation, identify Critical risks, report evidence confidence, and optionally shortlist works within separate maturity tracks. Use when a user asks to judge, score, critique, review, diagnose, batch-evaluate, or rank designs by evidence-aligned evaluation score. Do not use this skill to retrieve winners, choose an award, produce a redesign, audit submission-file compliance, simulate an official jury, or predict winning probability.
design-award-match
Match a design project to supported design-award programs, tracks, and entry categories; apply structural eligibility gates; verify current official rules; compare published criteria and cautiously described winner trends; and output fit, evidence confidence, and submission priority. Use when a user asks which award or category to enter, compares awards, or requests an award-fit analysis. Supports iF, iF Student, Red Dot Product, Red Dot Design Concept, IDEA, DIA, K-Design, GOOD DESIGN AWARD Japan, Core77, James Dyson, and EPDA. Do not use for winner retrieval alone, detailed submission-file compliance, general design evaluation, optimization, or winning-probability prediction.
design-system-adherence
Audits whether a finished artifact actually follows the design system it was supposed to follow. Takes a design system as the yardstick (a Claude Design bundle, a CSS token file, a stylesheet) plus one or more artifacts (PDF, PNG/JPG, HTML) and returns measured findings — colour, typography, contrast — each with computed severity, the evidence it rests on and a specific fix. It DIAGNOSES; it does not redesign, rewrite or produce corrected assets, and it refuses to run without a design system to measure against. Use it whenever someone asks "does this follow our design system?", "is this on brand?", "audit this deck against our tokens", "check these screens against the styleguide", "why does this look off?", "did they use our colours?", "is our brand consistent across these pieces?", "review this PDF for brand compliance", or shares a design system together with something made from it. Also triggers on "contrast check", "WCAG audit" and "accessibility check" when a stylesheet is supplied.