polish-language
FeaturedAcademic English consistency linting and non-native (ESL) language polish for medical manuscripts. Deterministically flags abbreviation define-once violations, US/UK spelling drift, hyphen-vs-en-dash numeric ranges, P/p case, hyphenation variants, small-number style, and value/unit spacing, then guides a style-only clarity pass that never alters numbers, citations, or scientific meaning. Distinct from humanize (AI-tell removal) and check-reporting (guideline items).
Install
Quality Score: 95/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- Aperivue
- Repository
- Aperivue/medsci-skills
- Created
- 5 months ago
- Last Updated
- 4 days ago
- Language
- Python
- License
- MIT
Bundled in these plugins
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
writing-polish
Polishing of the USER'S OWN academic prose across five dimensions — accuracy, clarity/readability, formality, register & conventions, and stance — for language assessment / applied linguistics writing. Built for multilingual and early-career academics. Use when the user asks to "polish my writing", "improve the English", "check the style / register / formality", "is this too informal", or wants a draft to read like the field's published prose. Accuracy errors are corrected directly (with a change log); everything stylistic is numbered proposals the author accepts one at a time, each with its reason — preserving the author's voice throughout.
paper-language-pass
Multi-agent staged language polish for English-language academic manuscripts whose science is already settled (post peer-review). Runs eight parallel specialist subagents — consistency, tense, hedging, prose, coherence, abstract, manuscript hygiene (reviewer-talk, sycophancy, implementation leakage), and AI-authorship tells (hype adjectives, self-coined jargon, evaluative adverb openers, procedural section roadmaps, recycled arguments, em-dash density) — each scanning the whole paper for one dimension. Venue- and discipline-agnostic — user provides venue rules (citation policy, tense, spelling, word limit, etc.) and the skill calibrates severity accordingly; unspecified rules fall back to general academic defaults with downgraded flags. Produces a unified, severity-ranked, numbered issue list, then waits for user approval before applying any fix. Use when the user has a near-final draft (.docx, .md, or .tex) and wants a systematic language pass. Trigger phrases include "language pass", "polish my paper", "pro
polish
Use whenever the user asks to "humanize", "make this sound more human", "rewrite to avoid AI detection", "make this less AI-sounding", "add a human voice", or "write like a person". Also use when the user pastes text and asks why it reads as robotic, generic, flat, or AI-like, or when generating new text in a register where AI tells (em dashes, semicolons, hedges, banned vocabulary like "delve", "leverage", "robust") would damage credibility.