codex-review

Featured

Get an independent cross-model code review from OpenAI Codex (a different vendor's model) on the current review scope: branch diff plus staged, unstaged, and untracked working tree changes. A different training distribution has non-overlapping blind spots, so Codex catches spec ambiguity, missing edge cases, and fake tests that Claude's self-review cannot see. Use before merging, after a tricky change, or for a debug second opinion. Triggers: 'codex review', 'second opinion', 'cross review', 'outside voice', '让 codex 审', '找外部意见', '二审'.

Code & Development 431 stars 34 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 94/100

Stars 20%
88
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# codex-review — independent second opinion from Codex Self-review shares the author's blind spots: the reviewer is the same model that wrote the code, working from the same assumptions. A different-vendor model (OpenAI Codex) has a different training distribution, so its blind spots do not overlap with Claude's. One side writes, the other side challenges — a cheap QA pass. This skill runs the Codex CLI as a **read-only** reviewer and presents its output **verbatim**. It never edits your code. ## When to use - Before merging an important diff (last gate). - After writing a spec / tests — ask Codex to find ambiguity and weak assertions. - A hard bug whose root cause is unclear (independent diagnosis). ## Step 0 — Preflight (binary + auth) ```bash command -v codex >/dev/null 2>&1 || { echo "[codex-review] Codex CLI not found. Install with: npm install -g @openai/codex (then 'codex login'). Skipping." exit 0 } ``` If this prints the skip message, tell the user Codex is not installed and stop. ## Step 1 — Resolve review scope ```bash ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null) || { echo "[codex-review] not in a git repo"; exit 0; } cd "$ROOT" BASE=$(git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's|refs/remotes/||') if [ -z "$BASE" ]; then if git rev-parse --verify -q origin/main >/dev/null 2>&1; then BASE=origin/main elif git rev-parse --verify -q origin/master >/dev/null 2>&1; then BASE=origin/master elif git rev-parse --verify -q main >/de...

Details

Author
Ancienttwo
Repository
Ancienttwo/repo-harness
Created
5 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
TypeScript
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Code & Development Listed

codex-review

Second-opinion review of the current diff via the Codex CLI, read-only. Use when you want an independent adversarial review of a diff from a different model before merging. Manual only. NOT a replacement for /multi-review or /validate; Codex never edits — findings are advisory and Claude applies any fixes.

0 Updated today
SamyakJhaveri
AI & Automation Listed

codex-review

Get an independent cross-model code review from OpenAI Codex (via the codex MCP server) on the current changes or a given scope, then synthesize it with Claude's own review into one actionable report. Use when the user asks to review / double-check / get a second opinion on the current work, or invokes /codex-review.

0 Updated 1 months ago
dougefla
AI & Automation Listed

codex-review

Cross-model second opinion from the OpenAI Codex CLI (a different model family), read-only, in two seams — (1) code review of the current diff; (2) plan-stage premise challenge of a design packet (refute / missing / alternative, never a design). Opt-in only — use ONLY when the user explicitly asks with "codex review", "cross-model review", "second opinion on this diff", "別モデルでレビュー", "プランを Codex に反証させて", "前提を別モデルで叩いて", or invokes /codex-review or /codex-review --plan <file>. NOT a default step of the implementation chain (自発発火しない), NOT for letting Codex write code or design (read-only, divergence only), and NOT a replacement for the in-Claude reviewers.

2 Updated 1 weeks ago
shimo4228