cabbagecachekid
UserKeep AI-assisted writing honest and yours: an AI-written check, a cringe check, and a full-review orchestrator (anti-inflation + fact passes). Composable Claude Agent Skills.
Categories
Indexed Skills (11)
full-review
Runs a structured multi-pass review of human-facing professional copy and presents findings as a before/after diff table with reasoning, lists what was deliberately left out, and waits for explicit sign-off before changing anything. The passes are AI tells, a register-supplied positioning pass, honesty and distortion (catching claims silently inflated OR softened), tone and positioning, voice register, and fact verification. Calibration comes from a register file (job-seeker by default; publication included) and an optional one-page profile, so the same review serves résumés, editorials, or a house style; add a register for anything else. Use at any stage of refining or expanding copy with AI — not just at the end — when reviewing or workshopping a resume, cover letter, portfolio page, case study, proposal, or bio, when the user asks to "review my copy", "do a full review", "run the full pass", or polish writing for hiring managers or clients.
ai-written-check
Detects the mechanical tells that make professional prose read as AI-generated — em dashes, triple-list anaphora, "not X but Y" antithetical pairs, spatial and economic metaphors for abstract ideas, "architect" as a verb, engineered sentence cadence, mid-paragraph register swerves, builder/startup slang, sincerity adverbs ("honestly", "quietly"), and unfalsifiable universal claims ("everyone", "across the board"). Use when reviewing or editing a resume, cover letter, portfolio page, case study, proposal, bio, or any human-facing copy, or when the user asks for an "AI-written check", "AI tells", says copy "sounds like AI", or asks to make writing sound less generated.
cringe-check
Audits professional and application copy for tone and positioning that reads as cocky, parroting, or presumptuous — solo-hero framing where the author is the only agent, positioning-against unnamed others to look smart by contrast, parroting a job description's distinctive phrases verbatim, prescribing a client's reality or priorities in a proposal, undermining a polished deliverable with unsolicited "happy to convert it" offers, and overclaiming authority or flattening hobby and enterprise work into false parallel. Use when reviewing a resume, cover letter, portfolio page, proposal, or pitch, or when the user asks for a "cringe check" or worries their copy sounds arrogant, try-hard, or like it is sucking up.
copyright-creative-work
Use when protecting, documenting, or registering your OWN creative work under US copyright — songs, lyrics, writing, photos, or other original work. Triggers: about to release or publish a song or track; registering a work at copyright.gov (eCO); "who owns this," "do I own this"; copyrighting AI-generated or Suno-assisted music and the human-authorship requirement; what to disclaim or disclose when registering AI-assisted work; co-writer splits and split sheets; clearing samples; recording covers; mechanical or sync licensing; or deciding when to escalate to an IP lawyer, a PRO, or the MLC. US-focused (copyright is jurisdiction-specific); informational, not legal advice. NOT for reproducing or assessing other people's copyrighted material.
journey-map
Use when the user wants to create, map, or visualize a user journey, customer journey, experience map, or milestone map — "map the journey," "build a journey map," "chart the experience from X to Y," or any request to represent a user's progression through a product over time. Also use when converting research findings, interview synthesis, or funnel data into a journey visualization, and even when the user's draft framing is screen-based ("map our onboarding screens"). Works in FigJam when a write-capable Figma connection exists (e.g. the claude.ai Figma connector), and falls back to a portable markdown matrix when it doesn't.
line-edit
Polish a draft the author already wrote — fix grammar, punctuation, awkward phrasing, wordiness, and clarity at the sentence level WITHOUT changing meaning or flattening voice. A light-touch line editor, not a rewriter. Defaults to a professional register (business email). Use when the user says "polish this," "clean up this email," "line-edit," "proofread," "tighten this," "fix the grammar," "make this read better/more professional," or hands over a draft email/message/doc and wants it sharper. Do NOT use for tone, positioning, cockiness, or AI-tells work — that is full-review / cringe-check / ai-written-check.
using-neon-jetpack
Use when any writing, review, research, or shipping task begins — reviewing, polishing, or shipping human-facing writing or web pages, mapping a user journey, or protecting creative work. Routes to the right neon-jetpack skill (line-edit, ai-written-check, cringe-check, full-review, ux-web-design-review, journey-map, copyright-creative-work) and defines how they chain, so the right depth of review runs in the right order.
ux-web-design-review
Use when reviewing a website, web page, screenshot, or web copy against UX best practices grounded in human behavior rather than current fashion — auditing readability, scannability, visual hierarchy, cognitive load, or trust, separating what's evidence-backed from what's merely in style, with every claim tied to a real cited source. Triggers include "how strong is this page," "review my site's UX," "is this good design or just trendy," "evidence-based UX check," or asking whether a layout/copy follows web usability research.
ai-written-check
Detects the mechanical tells that make professional prose read as AI-generated — em dashes, triple-list anaphora, "not X but Y" antithetical pairs, spatial and economic metaphors for abstract ideas, "architect" as a verb, engineered sentence cadence, mid-paragraph register swerves, builder/startup slang, sincerity adverbs ("honestly", "quietly"), and unfalsifiable universal claims ("everyone", "across the board"). Use when reviewing or editing a resume, cover letter, portfolio page, case study, proposal, bio, or any human-facing copy, or when the user asks for an "AI-written check", "AI tells", says copy "sounds like AI", or asks to make writing sound less generated.
cringe-check
Audits professional and application copy for tone and positioning that reads as cocky, parroting, or presumptuous — solo-hero framing where the author is the only agent, positioning-against unnamed others to look smart by contrast, parroting a job description's distinctive phrases verbatim, prescribing a client's reality or priorities in a proposal, undermining a polished deliverable with unsolicited "happy to convert it" offers, and overclaiming authority or flattening hobby and enterprise work into false parallel. Use when reviewing a resume, cover letter, portfolio page, proposal, or pitch, or when the user asks for a "cringe check" or worries their copy sounds arrogant, try-hard, or like it is sucking up.
full-review
Runs a structured multi-pass review of human-facing professional copy and presents findings as a before/after diff table with reasoning, lists what was deliberately left out, and waits for explicit sign-off before changing anything. The passes are AI tells, a register-supplied positioning pass, honesty and distortion (catching claims silently inflated OR softened), tone and positioning, voice register, and fact verification. Calibration comes from a register file (job-seeker by default; publication included) and an optional one-page profile, so the same review serves résumés, editorials, or a house style; add a register for anything else. Use at any stage of refining or expanding copy with AI — not just at the end — when reviewing or workshopping a resume, cover letter, portfolio page, case study, proposal, or bio, when the user asks to "review my copy", "do a full review", "run the full pass", or polish writing for hiring managers or clients.
Bio shown is the top-scored skill's repo description as a fallback — real GitHub bios land in a future update.