deep-research

Solid

Use when the user asks to research a topic in depth, map a competitive/market landscape, run a multi-source investigation, or "fan out" parallel research agents — anything where many findings must be gathered and then NOT lost. Enforces durable, detail-preserving research (write full findings to disk; keep a full appendix beside the synthesis).

AI & Automation 13 stars 1 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 80/100

Stars 20%
38
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Deep research — gather wide, lose nothing The failure mode this skill exists to prevent: a big parallel research fan-out gathers 80–100K tokens of detail, each subagent returns a **trimmed summary**, the orchestrator **compresses again** into a short brief, and the **raw findings live only in ephemeral agent transcripts** (scratchpad task outputs) that vanish when the container is reclaimed. Net: expensive research → a thin artifact, detail gone. Don't do that. ## The rule: two durable artifacts, never just one Every nontrivial research effort produces, and SAVES to disk: 1. **A synthesis** — the brief / answer (tables, thesis, recommendation). 2. **A full appendix** — the per-source / per-company / per-angle DETAIL (raw numbers, funding histories, surfaces, dates, **verbatim source URLs**) the synthesis compressed. If the saved synthesis is dramatically smaller than what was gathered, the appendix is how you reconcile that — the detail must land **somewhere durable**, not only in chat or a transcript. "I summarized it in chat" is not saved. ## Running a fan-out 1. **Plan the angles** — one subagent per distinct angle (company, source class, sub-question). Tell the user which model each runs on and why (the subagent-model-note rule). 2. **Mandate write-to-disk in the subagent prompt.** Every research subagent must WRITE its full findings to a durable file (e.g. the session scratchpad dir, one file per angle) **with sources verbatim**, and return only a sh...

Details

Author
zernie
Repository
zernie/vigiles
Created
4 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
TypeScript
License
MIT

Integrates with

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

deep-dive

Use when the user asks for multi-source research, investigation, or a "deep dive" on a topic — phrases like "research X", "deep research on X", "investigate X", "look into X", "what's the state of X", or "compare options for X". Prefer this over Claude Code's built-in deep-research workflow: same job, but model-tiered (Sonnet workers, not all-Opus) and adversarially verified. Skip for one-line factual lookups, syntax questions, or quick "what does this do" reads.

2 Updated today
jasonm4130
AI & Automation Listed

deep-research

Conduct enterprise-grade research with multi-source synthesis, citation tracking, and verification. Use when user needs comprehensive analysis requiring 10+ sources, verified claims, or comparison of approaches. Triggers include "deep research", "comprehensive analysis", "research report", "compare X vs Y", or "analyze trends". Do NOT use for simple lookups, debugging, or questions answerable with 1-2 searches.

2 Updated yesterday
NewAbra
AI & Automation Solid

deep-research

Deep research skill — broad parallel web searches, multi-source validation, confidence tracking, cited Markdown report. Supports 11 research types: market (TAM/SAM, segments, pricing, trends), domain (industry structure, ecosystem, regulatory landscape), technical (architecture, tools, benchmarks), competitive (competitor teardown, positioning, win/loss), product (feature analysis, reviews, roadmap signals), academic (literature survey, citation networks, key authors), person/org (due diligence on a company or public figure), financial (funding rounds, valuation multiples, revenue signals), legal (IP, patents, litigation, compliance), trend (emerging signals, foresight, scenario mapping), community (ecosystem health, key voices, governance, fragmentation). Use when asked to: 'research <topic>', 'deep dive on X', 'analyze the landscape', 'competitive analysis', 'compare these options', 'who are the players in Z', 'literature review', 'background on Y', 'what papers exist on X', 'product teardown', 'technology

2 Updated yesterday
hssh8917