create-conclusionslisted

# /create-conclusions The conclusions section shows what the work did for the field. It is the section researchers give least attention to and it is structurally the easiest to get right, because good conclusions across good journals follow a recognizable pattern. Write it **second**, immediately after results and discussion, while the findings are fresh. That is the course's writing order. ## Before anything else 1. **Load the style rules.** Invoke `paper-writing-style` and read `references/human-voice.md` and `references/latex-conventions.md`. If absent, use the condensed rules at the bottom. 2. **Lock the language.** Language of the user's first message, whole run, no switching. **Output LaTeX is always English.** 3. **Read the context.** You need the results and discussion section above all: the conclusions are built from it. Also read the introduction if it exists, the `.bib`, and detect the citation style. ## The inverse funnel The introduction narrows from the broad field to your purpose. The conclusions do the exact opposite, and that symmetry is what closes the hourglass shape of the paper: | Movement | Carries | Altitude | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Principal result | Your main finding, restated | Most specific | | Brief interpretation | What it means | Widening | | Contribution | How this advances the broad field | Most general | Open at the narrowest point and widen continuously to the end. The final sentences should be the most general in the secti