adversarial-reviewlisted

# Adversarial review (platform skill — single source) **Who runs:** the coding agent (OpenClaw Main / Claude-TUI / Codex-TUI), **not** the human. **Never** tell the user to copy-paste `run.sh` as the primary path. **Never** replace this with a solo monologue and call it 对抗审查 (that is 设计批判). This directory is the **only** skill + runner unit. Other paths are **symlinks** (user-level or in-repo discovery). Do not maintain a second SKILL.md body. ## Who runs what | Actor | Duty | | --- | --- | | **Human** | Intent only:「对抗审查」「审一下这批改动」「按推荐审查」 | | **Any agent** | **Load this skill → resolve TOOL + TARGET → run → disclose** | | **Host headless backends** | `claude` / `codex` / `grok` as find/refute (not ACP by default) | ## When to load / run - User asks for 对抗审查 / adversarial review / multi-role review - Write-task checklist: acceptance suggests review - Runtime code/scripts changed (any git TARGET the agent may review) - After editing this toolkit itself → `dogfood` **Skip / redirect:** - Pure docs/tests-only (runner auto-skips); user explicitly skips with reason - **Design docs / RFC / ADR / 方案提案** (no runtime diff): do **not** force this skill. Use **设计评审** (structured checklist in host `validation.md` → Design proposal review) or **brainstorm** only when the user still wants alternative approaches. Never label a doc critique 对抗审查. ## Multi-role minimum | Role | Stance | Runner stage | | --- | --- | --- | | find / reviewer | guilty-until-proven | stage 1 | |