paper-reproducelisted

## Goal Verify whether the paper's claims are correct. Maintain strict neutrality throughout: supported and disputed are equally valid scientific outcomes. **Done means**: every Claim has a clear conclusion — supported, disputed, refuted, or proposed. `proposed` is the conclusion of last resort when a verdict genuinely cannot be reached; it requires `declare-barrier` skill to have been invoked and is not an exit ramp. ## How to use the Toulmin graph ### Extract the argument structure Read the paper and extract its argument structure. Every node starts as a hypothesis. - `create_claim` — the paper's conclusion; initializes as `proposed`, updated to `supported`, `disputed`, or `refuted` via `update_node` based on verification results - `create_ground(source="hypothesis", verification="pending")` — the paper's stated experimental result, written as a declarative finding; initializes as a hypothesis, updated via `update_node` as verification proceeds - `create_warrant` — the inference principle connecting Ground to Claim - `create_backing` (if any) — what supports the Warrant's authority - `create_rebuttal` (if any) — exceptions the paper acknowledges > **Chained reasoning**: when a sub-Claim serves as evidence for another Claim, use `create_ground(ref_claim_id=sub-Claim.id)`. Once extracted, run `compile_arguments` to verify the reasoning structure is logically coherent. Re-run it any time you modify the argument structure. ### Drive action from Claims For each Claim,