agent-eval
SolidHead-to-head comparison of coding agents (Claude Code, Aider, Codex, etc.) on custom tasks with pass rate, cost, time, and consistency metrics
Install
Quality Score: 78/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- yanacuti1121
- Repository
- yanacuti1121/Yana-AI
- Created
- 2 months ago
- Last Updated
- yesterday
- Language
- Python
- License
- Apache-2.0
Integrates with
Bundled in these plugins
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
agent-evaluation
Evaluate LLM agents and tool-using workflows—task success, tool accuracy, latency/cost, safety, and regression suites. Use when shipping agent features, comparing prompts/models, or debugging agent failures.
agent-evaluation
Use when evaluating an AI agent — task completion, tool-use correctness, trajectory scoring, automation rate, and human-in-the-loop review. Triggers on "agent evaluation", "agent eval", "task completion rate", "tool-use accuracy", "trajectory", "automation rate".
build-agent-evals
Build automated evaluations for an AI agent from scratch: collecting tasks from real failures, choosing code/model/human graders, picking pass@k vs pass^k, building an isolated harness, and keeping the suite honest over time. Use this whenever someone wants to measure, benchmark, or regression-test an agent, write an eval harness for an LLM agent, decide how to grade non-deterministic output, set up an LLM-as-judge, or asks any version of "how do I know if my agent is actually getting better." Trigger even when they say "tests for my agent," "eval set," or "agent benchmark" rather than the word "evals," or when they ask about benchmark contamination or a model recognizing the eval. Not for container or resource limits making scores flaky across runs; that's calibrate-eval-infrastructure.