nerissa-competitive-researchlisted

# nerissa-competitive-research · Disciplined Competitor Research SOP A field-tested SOP for competitive research that refuses lazy AI shortcuts. Built from real mistakes — sourcing from secondhand blogs, inheriting unverified DD judgments, confusing funding size with relevance, treating "in negotiation" as "signed". Every rule in this skill traces back to a specific failure mode this skill prevents. ## When to Trigger **✅ Trigger when**: - User explicitly says: "research X company", "竞品调研", "调研 X 家", "do competitive analysis", "stress-test this competitor" - Adding any new competitor to an existing comparison table or matrix - Validating a competitor claim before publishing (pitch deck / report / website) - User questions a previous competitive judgment ("are you sure about X?") **❌ Do NOT trigger for**: - Casual market discussion without a specific company - User explicitly asks for a brief one-line answer - General industry trend questions ## Core Principles (Earned from Real Failures) | # | Principle | What It Prevents | |---|---|---| | 1 | **Every "signed / acquired / valuation / customer count" claim needs verifiable source** | Repeating "$500k seed" from a DD report when reality is "$0 bootstrapped" (one secondhand blog was wrong) | | 2 | **Open the official website. Don't rely on aggregator blogs** | Treating an anti-scraping 403 as "no website exists" and skipping the company entirely | | 3 | **Inheriting historical judgment requires explicit tagging** | Recomme