master-curriculum

Featured

Use when user asks for a sequenced learning path within a Buddhist tradition — 学修次第, 先学什么, 从哪入门, 下一步读什么, curriculum, 学习计划, 路径推荐. Differs from /compare-masters (parallel opinion) and /master-debate (adversarial dialectic) by being 纵向 / 时序: stage-by-stage plan keyed on tradition × level (L0-L3) → foundation → intermediate → advanced + blind spots. Trigger is planning intent — "禅宗对比" goes to /compare-masters; "禅宗从哪开始学" goes here.

AI & Automation 312 stars 63 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 96/100

Stars 20%
83
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# 学修路径 (Master Curriculum) — 元 Skill > 本路径依据历史佛教文献生成,仅供学习参考。如需正式修行指导,请亲近善知识。 ## 决策树:选择哪份路径? ### 优先级 1 — 用户显式指定传统 | 用户说 | 加载 reference | |--------|---------------| | 禅宗 / 禅 / 见性 | `references/chan.md` | | 净土 / 念佛 / 弥陀 | `references/jingtu.md` | | 天台 / 止观 | `references/tiantai.md` | | 华严 / 一真法界 | `references/huayan.md` | | 唯识 / 法相 / 瑜伽行 | `references/weishi.md` | | 三论 / 中观 / 般若 | `references/sanlun-zhongguan.md` | | 格鲁 / 应成 / 道次第 | `references/gelug-madhyamaka.md` | | 上座部 / 内观 / vipassana | `references/theravada-vipassana.md` | ### 优先级 2 — 关键词匹配 从用户输入抽取关键词,匹配每份 reference 顶部的 `## 触发关键词` 列表,取最高分。若用户说"什么传统都行 / 综合理论",按 keyword density 给一份**默认推荐**而非平均加载。 ### 优先级 3 — 兜底(无 reference 命中) 若全部 reference 关键词分数均为 0(典型例:噶举 / 米拉日巴 / 真言宗 / 黄檗 / 等暂未提供路径的传统),**不要**用任何 reference。明确告诉用户本传统尚无 curriculum 路径,并建议改用对应单 master skill(如 `/master-milarepa`)或先 `/compare-masters` 横向了解后再选定方向。禁止套用错误传统的路径。 ## 输入收集(缺则反问) 1. **目标传统/法门** — 必填 2. **当前位置**(必填,缺则反问): - **L0** 完全零基础 - **L1** 读过白话简介 - **L2** 能读基本经论但缺次第 - **L3** 有专修但想深入对比 3. **现实约束**(可选):每周可投入时间 / 母语限制(文言/巴利/藏文)/ 有无指导老师 ## 输出框架(统一模板) ```markdown > 本路径依据历史佛教文献生成,仅供学习参考。如需正式修行指导,请亲近善知识。 ## 你的学修路径:<传统> · 从 L<n> 开始 ### 一、根基(入门,建议 N 周) - **主用经/论**:《<经名>》【<cbeta_id 或 sc_uid>】 - **推荐 master**:`/master-<slug>` — <此阶段教什么> - **目标**:能用自己的话讲清 <3 个核心概念> ### 二、深入(进阶,M 周) - 主用经/论 + 配合 master + 关键议题 ### 三、精研(专修,长期) - 主用经/论 + 配合 master + 验收标准 ### 四、可能的盲点 (本传统初学者最易踩 2-3 个陷阱 + 各祖师对此的提醒) ### 延伸 - 交叉对比 → `/compare-masters` - 了解争议 → `/master-de...

Details

Author
xr843
Repository
xr843/Master-skill
Created
3 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Python
License
MIT

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Featured

master-help

Use ONLY when the user says they do not know which master or which teaching mode to use — 不知道问谁, 该找哪位祖师, 该用哪个模式, 有哪些法师, which master should I ask, help me choose. This is a router, not a teacher: it names a destination and stops. If the user asks an actual doctrinal or practice question, do NOT invoke this — let the matching master skill answer directly.

312 Updated today
xr843
AI & Automation Featured

compare-masters

Use when user asks to compare masters, compare schools, compare perspectives, 对比, 各宗怎么看, 不同宗派, 禅净之争, 性相之辩, 空有之争, or wants multiple masters to answer the same question. Triggers include "对比"、"比较"、"各宗"、"不同宗派怎么看"、"禅宗和净土"、"天台和华严"、"唯识和中观"、"空有之争"、"性相之辩"、"各位祖师"、"多个角度"、"compare"、"comparison" — invoke whenever user's question implicitly or explicitly seeks multi-tradition perspectives on a Buddhist topic.

312 Updated today
xr843
AI & Automation Featured

master-debate

Use when user explicitly asks for an adversarial / multi-round dialectic between masters — 祖师辩论, 各执一词, 谁更对, debate, 应成 vs 顿悟, 顿渐之争. Differs from /compare-masters (parallel single-round) by being adversarial multi-round via fresh-subagent orchestration. Topics 空有 / 禅净 / 性相 / 戒律 vs 内观 — trigger is adversarial framing: "禅净比较" → compare; "禅净辩论 / 谁更究竟" → here.

312 Updated today
xr843