private-company-research

Featured

AI Berkshire skill: 未上市公司研究:多Agent并行深度研究框架. Source: skills/private-company-research.md.

AI & Automation 14,533 stars 2040 forks Updated yesterday MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 93/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

## Codex adapter note This skill is generated from `skills/private-company-research.md` so Claude Code and Codex users share one canonical workflow. - Treat `$ARGUMENTS` as the user's request in the current Codex thread. - When the source mentions Claude-only surfaces such as Task, Agent, WebSearch, Bash, Read, or Write, use the closest Codex capability available in this session: subagents when available, web search when needed, shell commands for local tools, and normal file edits for workspace files. - Use shared project tools from `tools/` in this repository. Prefer running commands from the repository root with paths like `python3 tools/financial_rigor.py ...`; if the current thread starts outside the repo, locate the actual checkout path first instead of assuming a fixed home-directory path. - Before starting research, run the `date` command to confirm today's date; treat it as the baseline for "latest" data and state the data cutoff date in the report header. Never assume the current date from training data. - Preserve the research quality rules from `AGENTS.md`: cross-check financial data, use exact arithmetic tools for valuation/math, and clearly label uncertainty and source gaps. # 未上市公司研究:多Agent并行深度研究框架 对 $ARGUMENTS 进行团队化深度研究分析。专为蚂蚁集团、小红书、SpaceX、Stripe 等未上市公司设计。 **最终目标**:在信息天然稀缺的条件下,尽可能还原这家公司的**真实价值**——不是市场给的估值,而是生意本身值多少钱。 ## 框架特点 未上市公司 vs 上市公司研究的核心差异: - **无标准化财报**:需多源拼凑、交叉验证 - **估值锚定少**:依赖融资轮次、可比公司法、情景推演 - **信息不对称大**:需要更多"拼图式"研究方法 - **退出路径不确定**:IPO/并购/二级转让均有...

Details

Author
xbtlin
Repository
xbtlin/ai-berkshire
Created
3 months ago
Last Updated
yesterday
Language
Python
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category