humanize-docs

Solid

Transform AI-generated documentation into human-readable prose with personality. USE WHEN: Converting rigid AI docs (checklist spam, CAPS LOCK emphasis, perfect symmetric structures, template dumps) into flowing, conversational writing that feels colleague-authored. Different from /humanizer — that skill detects AI writing patterns (Wikipedia taxonomy). This skill does aggressive deformalization of document structure and flow. PRIMARY TRIGGERS: "humanize this doc", "make this readable", "remove AI patterns from doc", "add human touch to this" See also: humanizer skill for text-level AI pattern removal.

AI & Automation 11 stars 3 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 85/100

Stars 20%
36
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Humanize Docs Transforms robotic AI-generated documentation into prose that sounds like an actual human wrote it. The approach is **aggressive deformalization** — not just tweaking tone, but restructuring how information flows to break AI's predictable patterns. This is a different tool than the humanizer skill. Humanizer removes AI writing tells at the sentence/phrase level (em-dashes, rule-of-three, vague attributions, sycophantic openers). Humanize-docs attacks structural AI-ness: checkbox spam, template overload, perfect symmetry, emotional flatness across an entire document. ## When to use this Clear signals you're dealing with AI-generated docs: - Checkbox overload: `- [x] Task 1: Do the thing (AC: #1)` - CAPS LOCK for CRITICAL IMPORTANT NOTES - 8+ code templates embedded in one document - Every section has exactly 3 perfectly balanced paragraphs - Headers like "LLM Developer Guardrails" - Phrases: "Certainly, here is...", "It's important to note that...", "Furthermore..." ## Transformation workflow ### Step 1: Detect Quick test — does the doc have 5+ of these? - Perfect structural symmetry (every section same length) - Zero sentence length variation (all 15-20 words) - Checkbox addiction - Template embedding mania - Emotional flatness (no "wait, why?" or "honestly...") If yes, proceed. If no, it might already be human-written — don't over-transform. ### Step 2: Apply the five core transformations Execute in order. Don't apply all of them everywhere — humans...

Details

Author
wrg32786
Repository
wrg32786/aigent-os
Created
1 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
JavaScript
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

plastic-humanizer

Use to clean authored prose so it reads human and clutter-free. Removes AI tells and slop from a document, spec, outcome, README, report, or release note. Use when the user says "humanize", "de-slop", "remove the AI tells", or "clean up the wording". For documents, not for every chat reply, and not for code.

9 Updated 1 weeks ago
zalom
AI & Automation Listed

humanizer

Remove signs of AI-generated writing from prose that carries a personal voice, tuned for Claude output. Use when the user asks to humanize, de-AI, clean up, or improve the tone of blog posts, essays, opinion pieces, launch announcements, newsletters, emails, or long-form articles that read like an LLM wrote them. Also use to judge whether a given text was AI-generated. Triggers on AI patterns like markdown overuse, AI vocabulary, sycophantic openers, post action summaries, standalone caveat lines, unsolicited safety disclaimers, vague attributions, significance inflation, em dash overuse, or manufactured drama. Not for prose that lives in a repository or on a forge: commits, PRs, reviews, issues, READMEs, docs, changelogs, code comments, error messages.

0 Updated 4 days ago
svyatov
Code & Development Solid

humanizer

Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, negative parallelisms, and excessive conjunctive phrases. Credits: Original skill by @blader - https://github.com/blader/humanizer

105 Updated 2 days ago
NulightJens