decide

Solid

Run a decision through the 12-lens framework

AI & Automation 11 stars 3 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 78/100

Stars 20%
36
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
95
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Decision Framework Run any decision through the evaluation framework from `system/04_decision_frameworks.md`. Produces a structured recommendation. ## Usage `/decide [decision or opportunity to evaluate]` ## Process 1. **Parse the decision** — What's being decided? What are the options? 2. **Run relevant lenses** — Not all 12 apply to every decision. Select the 4-6 most relevant: - Leverage — disproportionate output? - Alignment — advances an active priority? - Reversibility — can it be undone? - Time Sensitivity — does waiting cost anything? - Revenue Impact — creates/protects/accelerates revenue? - Asymmetry — large upside, bounded downside? - Dependency — unblocks other work? - Cost — money, time, attention? - Compounding — gets better over time? - Simplicity — simpler path available? - Confidence — how certain are the inputs? - Opportunity Cost — what are we NOT doing? 3. **Check against principal's decision framework** — `system/14_decision_framework.md` - Does it pass the pattern filter? - Where does it sit in the priority stack? - Does it pass the asymmetry test? 4. **Check authority level** — `system/12_authority_matrix.md` - Is this Level 1 (just do it), Level 2 (recommend), or Level 3 (human only)? ## Output Format ``` DECISION: [What we're deciding] OPTIONS: [A vs B vs C] RECOMMENDATION: [What to do and why] KEY LENSES: [3-4 lenses that drove the recommendation] TRADE-OFF: [What we're giving up] CONFIDENCE: [...

Details

Author
wrg32786
Repository
wrg32786/aigent-os
Created
1 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
JavaScript
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

decision-framework

You are a decision-making coach. When given a difficult decision, apply multiple structured frameworks to help the user think clearly and make a confident choice. ## Process 1. Understand the decision and context 2. Apply Pros/Cons analysis 3. Apply 10/10/10 framework 4. Apply Regret Minimization framework 5. Apply Second-Order Thinking 6. Synthesize recommendations ## Output Format ## Decision Analysis: \[Decision\] ### Context \[Brief summary of the decision at hand\] ### Framework 1: Pros & Cons <table header-row='true'> <tr> <td>Pros</td> <td>Cons</td> </tr> <tr> <td>\[Pro 1\]</td> <td>\[Con 1\]</td> </tr> <tr> <td>\[Pro 2\]</td> <td>\[Con 2\]</td> </tr> </table> Weighted Score: Pros: X \| Cons: Y ### Framework 2: 10/10/10 - In 10 minutes: How will you feel? - In 10 months: What will be the impact? - In 10 years: Will this matter? ### Framework 3: Regret Minimization - Which...

0 Updated 1 weeks ago
prvthmpcypher
AI & Automation Featured

decide

When you have a decision to make and want a structured workflow that picks the load-bearing questions, walks through them, reaches a call (or "wait"), and archives the rationale for future reference. Based on the 37signals Guide to Making Decisions (38 questions) plus house additions like Q39 opportunity cost ("what does saying yes displace?"). Triages to 6–8 relevant questions per decision instead of forcing the full set. Archives every decision to ~/.config/makerskills/decide/archive/ with a revisit date so you can check later whether the call was right. Triggers on "/decide," "help me decide," "should I [X]," "I need to make a decision about," "stuck on a decision," "deciding between," "go/no-go on," "what should I do about." This is both the decision-making workflow AND the decision log — making the decision is the act of logging it.

229 Updated 2 days ago
coreyhaines31
AI & Automation Solid

decide

Formal decision-making interview for architectural choices

15 Updated today
jmylchreest