gate-probe

Solid

Prove a gate before trusting it. Inventory violations, plant a defect, verify RED, restore GREEN, prevent idle scans, and confirm automatic wiring.

AI & Automation 103 stars 15 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 85/100

Stars 20%
67
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Gate probe A green gate may be protecting the product or looking at nothing. Deliberately breaking the protected property is how to tell. - A **gate** is an automated check that blocks a violation: lint, contract test, e2e spec, or CI step. - A **probe** is a defect planted on purpose to prove that gate turns red. This repository has shipped gates that searched generated prose instead of the screen, stayed green after the subject was deleted, checked only a function name, matched zero files, or were invoked by no workflow. None had been probed. ## 0. State the property Write one sentence describing the product fact the gate protects. Distinguish the fact from its implementation. “The three installation stages remain reachable” is a property; “scroll equals zero” is an implementation detail. ## 1. Inventory before enabling For a new rule, count every current hit and classify it by pattern and legitimacy. Confirm the real violations fit one pull request. Hundreds of new warnings are noise that hides existing signal. A global raw-shadow ban once raised warnings from 144 to 548; a measured selector found five actual defects. If signal cannot be separated from noise, do not create the rule. Record the inventory and why the gate was rejected. ## 2. Plant the defect and require RED Temporarily restore the exact defect or insert one violating line. Run the gate. If it stays green, the gate does not exist. - Change only the probe line; never use `git checkout -- <file>`...

Details

Author
wlsdks
Repository
wlsdks/ontology-atlas
Created
4 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
TypeScript
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

rule-gate-integrity

Ways a gate or test proves nothing while looking decisive: grading a copy of itself, passing on emptiness, a canary firing for the wrong reason, a summary read as a verdict, a probe pointed at the wrong invocation. Load before writing a gate, a mutation harness, or any check guarding generated output.

3 Updated today
djnsty23
AI & Automation Listed

ground-truth-gates

Build executable verification gates (golden set, replay corpus, project checks) so "it works" becomes a checked fact instead of a claim. Load when changing any LLM-judgment step (classify/extract/route/prompt), refactoring logic that processes real logged data, designing tests for a fix, setting up a commit/ship gate for a project, designing a runtime guard (a hook, validator, or auth check) and its fail direction, or when you are about to trust a passing test that has never been shown able to fail. Also the reference for what "proof gate" means in delegation-and-review packets. Do NOT load for one-off scripts or exploratory spikes — plain operational-rigor covers those.

2 Updated 2 days ago
F-e-u-e-r
Code & Development Solid

gating

Build and audit deterministic verification gates — a check that blocks a pipeline and can be shown to go red. Use when writing a calibration gate, CI check, validation script or pre-publication check for a numeric or empirical result; when a plausible-but-wrong value would survive review; when asking whether an existing test, linter rule or check could actually fail; and when a suite passes first try, passes suspiciously often, or was written by whatever produced the thing it checks. Triggers on "can this check fail", "known-bad", "negative control", "calibration gate", "sanity check my results", "is this test actually testing anything".

148 Updated today
oaustegard