voice-setuplisted

Build, measure, edit, or switch a personal writing voice profile for the rabbit-writes plugin. Three ways in, from writing samples, from an interview, or from both together, which is the one to recommend. Use when the user wants to teach the system how they write, create their own writing style, set up or replace a voice, capture their tone, analyze documents they wrote to extract a voice, be interviewed about their style, change whose voice is active, blend two voices, or convert their writing samples into a reusable style profile. Also use when a draft "doesn't sound like me" and the saved profile needs correcting.
whit3rabbit/rabbit-writes · ★ 0 · Data & Documents · score 73

Install: claude install-skill whit3rabbit/rabbit-writes

# Voice setup Turn one person's way of writing into two files a machine can apply: - `voices/<name>.md`, the profile the model reads. Structure, mechanics, tone, register, refusals. - `voices/<name>.rules.json`, the subset a regex can decide. Enforced by `scan.py` at whatever priority the profile sets. Both live in `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/rabbit-writes/voices/`. They are plain text under version control, so a voice is editable, diffable, and shareable. **Paths.** `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/` means the directory holding this skill and its siblings (`rabbit-writes`, `voice-setup`, `rabbit-readme-improver`, `rabbit-reads`, `rabbit-rewrites`, `rabbit-claude-md`). Claude Code expands the variable. On a host that doesn't, such as Codex, resolve it that way by hand. ## The principle > Taste is boundaries. A voice is mostly refusals. What a person will not write is specific, checkable, and rare, which is what makes it a fingerprint. What they say they like is usually generic and describes half the writers alive. So weight everything here toward the **Hard nos**. If the interview runs short, cut from Structure and Tone. Never cut from Hard nos. Two other rules govern the whole process: **Do not write general writing advice into a profile.** "Avoid passive voice", "cut filler", "be concrete" apply to everyone and already live in the `rabbit-writes` engine, under `references/`. The test: *would this rule be wrong for a different person?* If yes, it is voice. If no, le