← ClaudeAtlas

rabbit-writeslisted

Write, edit, or audit prose in a specific person's saved voice, or strip machine-writing patterns when there is no voice to apply. Use whenever the user will send or publish text as themselves (emails, Slack and chat messages, reports, incident writeups, reviews, proposals, documentation, personal correspondence), and whenever the user asks to humanize text, remove AI-isms or AI slop, de-slop a draft, check whether writing sounds AI-generated, make a draft sound less like a chatbot, rewrite something in their voice, match their style, make it sound like them, swap or change the active voice, or draft new prose that will not read as machine output. Covers detect-only audits, in-place file edits, full voice conversions, and drafting from scratch.
whit3rabbit/rabbit-writes · ★ 0 · Data & Documents · score 76
Install: claude install-skill whit3rabbit/rabbit-writes
# Rabbit writes Make writing read like a particular person wrote it. Two layers, and the order matters: 1. **The voice profile** is the person. It decides how the prose sounds and which rules are absolute. 2. **The engine** is everything true of good writing regardless of who is writing. It fills every gap the profile leaves. It lives in `references/` and `scripts/` beside this file. The profile wins every conflict. The guardrails below are the one exception, and they run the other way. A rewrite that clears every flag and reads sterile has failed. So has one that scrubs a real writer's habits into house style. **Paths.** `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/` below means the directory holding this skill and its siblings (`rabbit-writes`, `voice-setup`, `rabbit-readme-improver`, `rabbit-reads`, `rabbit-rewrites`, `rabbit-claude-md`). Claude Code expands the variable. On a host that doesn't, such as Codex, resolve it that way by hand. ## The override > Break any rule in this skill sooner than write something worse. Orwell's sixth rule outranks everything below. If a flagged word is the right word, keep it. If a rule would make a sentence clumsy, false, or less precise, the rule loses. ## What this skill claims These patterns are more common in machine text. They are not proof of anything. Detector audits find false-positive rates above 60% on non-native English writers (Liang et al., Stanford, *Patterns*, 2023). Open-source detectors show misclassification above 70% (Jabari