citation-audit

Solid

Zero-context verification that every bibliographic entry in the paper is real, correctly attributed, and used in a context the cited paper actually supports. Uses a fresh cross-model reviewer with web/DBLP/arXiv lookup to catch hallucinated authors, wrong years, fabricated venues, version mismatches, and wrong-context citations (cite present but the cited paper does not establish the claim). Use when user says "审查引用", "check citations", "citation audit", "verify references", "引用核对", or before submission to ensure bibliography integrity.

AI & Automation 11,152 stars 1050 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 96/100

Stars 20%
100
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Citation Audit > 🔒 **Do not wrap this skill in `/loop`, `/schedule`, or `CronCreate`.** It is > verdict-bearing — it judges bibliographic correctness. Re-running that verdict > on a timer adds no new signal (it changes only when the *bibliography* > changes). Schedule the *external wait that precedes it* — bibliography > finalized → then audit **once**. See > [`shared-references/external-cadence.md`](../shared-references/external-cadence.md). Verify every `\cite{...}` in a paper against three independent layers: 1. **Existence** — the cited paper actually exists at the claimed arXiv ID / DOI / venue. 2. **Metadata correctness** — author names, year, venue, and title match canonical sources (DBLP, arXiv, ACL Anthology, Nature, OpenReview, etc.). 3. **Context appropriateness** — the cited paper actually supports the claim it is being used to support in the manuscript. This skill is the fourth layer of \aris{}'s evidence-and-claim assurance, complementing `experiment-audit` (code), `result-to-claim` (science verdict), and `paper-claim-audit` (numerical claims). Together they form a bottom-up integrity stack from raw evaluation code to manuscript bibliography. ## When to Use This Skill **Run before submission.** The right gating point is: - After `paper-write` has produced the LaTeX draft and bib file - After `paper-claim-audit` has verified numerical claims - Before final `paper-compile` for submission **Do not** run this on a half-written draft — most of the work is i...

Details

Author
wanshuiyin
Repository
wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep
Created
2 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Python
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

paper-claim-audit

Zero-context verification that every number, comparison, and scope claim in the paper matches raw result files. Uses a fresh cross-model reviewer with NO prior context to prevent confirmation bias. Use when user says "审查论文数据", "check paper claims", "verify numbers", "论文数字核对", or before submission to ensure paper-to-evidence fidelity.

11,152 Updated today
wanshuiyin
Data & Documents Listed

citation-receipts

Systematic per-citation verification protocol for academic writing. MUST be used whenever writing content that cites sources — papers, blog posts, SOTAs, or any document making factual claims about external work. Triggers (FR + EN) on any writing task involving references, citations, or bibliographic claims, or when the user asks to "verify citations", "check sources", "audit references", "validate bibliography", "produce receipts", "/paper-trail:audit-article", "/paper-trail:receipts". Produces a structured RECEIPTS.md report classifying each citation as VALID / ADJUST / INVALID with reason. Optional --warn mode inserts inline warnings into a .bak copy of the source document. Combined with sota-auditor (upstream existence audit), this skill is the **downstream** per-claim check.

2 Updated 4 days ago
roomi-fields
AI & Automation Listed

ref-verify

Prevents citation hallucination in academic writing. Invoke when: finding papers to support a specific claim; verifying/checking/auditing existing citations or DOIs; confirming whether a paper actually says what the user claims it says ('is that what the paper says?', 'did they actually show X?'); adding a citation by describing a paper ('add a citation for the paper where X'); running a pre-submission reference sweep. Do NOT invoke for: formatting references in APA/IEEE style, general topic explanations, citation style questions, or prose editing. Selects Quick Screen (seconds per paper) or Full Audit (abstract fetch + claim check) automatically.

0 Updated today
moonweave
AI & Automation Solid

citation-verification

This skill provides reference guidance for citation verification in academic writing. Use when the user asks about "citation verification best practices", "how to verify references", "preventing fake citations", or needs guidance on citation accuracy. This skill supports ml-paper-writing by providing detailed verification principles and common error patterns.

4,135 Updated today
Galaxy-Dawn
Data & Documents Listed

reference-verifier

Comprehensive academic reference auditor that performs four levels of verification on citations in uploaded manuscripts (.pdf, .docx). Level 1 checks if references actually exist. Level 2 verifies metadata accuracy (authors, year, journal, volume, pages). Level 3 checks whether the cited paper actually covers the topic it is cited for. Level 4 analyzes whether each citation is used correctly in context — confirming if the cited source truly supports, contradicts, or is neutral toward the claim being made. Saves a BibTeX file (.bib) and a markdown audit report (HTML optional) in the current working directory. Use whenever the user uploads a manuscript and asks to check, verify, validate, or audit references, citations, or bibliography, generate a .bib file, detect fake or hallucinated references, check citation accuracy, verify citation context, or audit a reference list. Especially tuned for biomedical/PubMed-indexed literature but works for any discipline.

0 Updated today
sbalci