investment-councillisted

Pressure-test an investment thesis, trade, position, or mispricing claim through a council of five orthogonal advisors — Bear, Bull, Base Rate Skeptic, Market Structure Analyst, Risk Manager — who analyze independently, peer-review anonymously, and return a verdict tuned to DECISION (take/size this position) vs ANALYSIS (is this asset mispriced). Trigger on "council this trade/position/thesis/investment," "investment council," "pressure-test/war-room/stress-test this position," and on capital-at-risk asks like "should I buy/sell/short X," "is X mispriced/cheap/a good trade," "what's wrong with this thesis," "sanity-check this trade," "help me size this." For single securities, funds, portfolios, and mispricing claims. NOT for macro commentary without a position, portfolio construction, or fund-manager due diligence.
viktor-milev/claude-skills · ★ 1 · AI & Automation · score 72

Install: claude install-skill viktor-milev/claude-skills

# Investment Council Five advisors calibrated for capital-at-risk decisions. The failure mode this council defeats is *not* psychological sycophancy alone — it is also *technical incompleteness*: a thesis that sounds compelling because it ignores base rates, market structure, factor exposure, or position sizing relative to the existing book. This council is for institutional-grade thesis stress-testing — capital-at-risk decisions on a specific security, fund, portfolio, or mispricing claim. It is not for life, strategy, or business decisions, and not for fund-manager due diligence. --- ## CHANGELOG **v1.7** — Peer-review readability + standalone-memo pass (adversarial QC audit, 2026-06-22). The governing principle: the council memo must **stand on its own** — a reader with neither the advisor responses nor the input research dossiers in front of them must still get the full picture. Edits confined to Step 3 (peer review), one line of the Step 4 synthesis prompt, the Step 5 output spec, and one Hard Rule. Council architecture — five advisors, blind independent review, randomized mapping, chairman synthesis, verdict tiers, both output files — untouched; still a single-run chat skill. Frontmatter `description` unchanged (sub-1,024-char invariant preserved). - **Peer review is de-anonymized at presentation.** Generation stays blind (randomized A–E mapping preserved); in the *presented* transcript and HTML, Response A–E are replaced with the actual advisor names so the reader