vike-wallet-comparelisted

# vike-wallet-compare ## Command ```bash vike wallet compare <address_a> <address_b> [--chain ethereum|bsc|base] [--window 24h|7d|30d|90d|180d|all] [--limit N] (max 50) [--json] ``` ## Output ```json { "address_a": "0x...", "address_b": "0x...", "window": "30d", "shared_counterparties": [ { "wallet": "0x...", "a_volume_usd": 50000, "b_volume_usd": 75000, "a_tx_count": 3, "b_tx_count": 5, "entity": "Binance", "wallet_type": "cex" }, ... ], "shared_tokens": [ { "token_address": "0x...", "a_volume_usd": 12000, "b_volume_usd": 8000, "a_tx_count": 2, "b_tx_count": 4 }, ... ], "summary": { "shared_counterparty_count": 7, "shared_token_count": 12 } } ``` ## Reading - Many shared counterparties + same entity types = likely operated by same person/group - Same exchange (Binance hot wallet) as counterparty for both = trivial overlap, both users of that CEX - Shared NICHE tokens (long-tail memes, low-vol) with similar tx counts = strong signal of coordination - Shared infra contracts (Uniswap, 1inch) = trivial overlap, ignore - Zero shared = wallets genuinely independent ## Anti-patterns - **Don't infer common ownership from CEX overlap.** Millions of users deposit to the same Binance hot wallets. Shared CEX counterparty = nothing. - **Don't claim coordination from common DEX router overlap** (Uniswap, 1inch routers). Almost every DEX user shares those. - Filter mentally for `wallet_type IN ('user', 'unknown')` overlap if you want a mean